全部 AI 动态
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_aiAI 评分5858
PixVerse@PixVerse_AI 评分5252
PixVerse@PixVerse_AI 评分2424中国仙侠世界观,由PixVerse上的MiniMax H3生动呈现。 漂浮的庙宇、玉桥、无尽云海,以及天际之上静谧的终章时刻。

PixVerse@PixVerse_AI 评分6969以下是 PixVerse 上完整的“Batu”提示词。史诗级广角镜头可即时生成。Seedance 2.5 让你精确控制具体镜头与运镜。
引用PixVerse@PixVerse_The Batu Khan was made with Seedance 2.5 on PixVerse 30s winter standoff: Batu’s cavalry. A Rus shield wall. Snow. Breath. RT + reply “BATU” → full workflow in DMs
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_aiAI 评分4242
引用AI/ML API@aimlapiMuse Glimmer one-shot 5 games! @AIatMeta dropped Muse Glimmer. So we ran it against Muse Spark 1.2, on five one-file game demos, each one written to play itself: Tetris, a top-down pixel street race, a rooftop web-slinger, a blue hedgehog platformer, and Flappy Bird. the setup: • Muse Glimmer 30B — via aimlapi[.]com. cost: $0.02 • Muse Spark 1.2 — via aimlapi[.]com. cost: $0.11 what we saw: • every Glimmer scene runs and plays itself. it's a reasoning model, so it burns more tokens — but the output is clean. its Tetris even scores each placement to keep lines clearing, and the blocks burst into pixels on every clear. • Glimmer beat Spark at Flappy Bird — its bird flew through the pipes cleaner. • but it's not perfect: in the racing game its cars sometimes slip off the road, and its graphics are simpler and blockier than Spark's. glad to see Meta back in open source — and we're waiting for Spark 1.2 weights next 🙌
MiniMax (official)@MiniMax_AIAI 评分3535引用Enze Xie@xieenze_jr🚀 MiniMax H3, accelerated on Day 1 with Sol Engine! Within just 4.5 hours, our agent-native Sol Video Inference Engine achieved: ⚡ 3.95× end-to-end speedup over Diffusers ⚡ 2.80× speedup over SGLang 🎬 8× NVIDIA GB200, 1344×768, 24 FPS, 124 frames The acceleration combines kernel fusion and graph capture, cross-step caching, and training-free sparse attention powered by Sol-Attn—with no distillation, fine-tuning, LoRA, or offline calibration. We are especially excited to see a powerful open-weight model like MiniMax H3 released to the community. Open models are essential for pushing video generation research, systems optimization, and real-world deployment forward. We hope this is the beginning of a much more vibrant open-source video generation ecosystem—and Sol Engine will keep working to make the latest models faster and easier to deploy from day one. 🔗https://nvlabs.github.io/Sana/Sol-Engine/H3/
Ant Ling@AntLingAGIAI 评分4040引用Sudo su@sudoingXive been playing with @AntLingAGI's ling 3.0 flash 124b for a week now, and i need to publish some numbers and performance i found valuable from this lab. a week ago the weights dropped. since then, on one dgx spark, i benched the community quant ladder, ran every official quant to ground, took the official int4 from doesn't run to the fastest single dgx spark path, watched the model write working software in one shot through an agent loop, and served its full 256K context. everything measured the same way and public, nothing tuned to flatter anyone. the verdict: ling 3.0 flash earned a permanent seat on my box. it's the fastest 124B class path i've measured on a single spark, 38.7 tok/s on the official int4 recipe, 35.2 on the community gguf, 2.4x what deepseek v4 flash does on the same hardware, and it writes correct code on the first pass often enough to feel like a different class of local model. dive with me into the full week of receipts, quant by quant, curve by curve 👇
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_aiAI 评分4040
引用atomic.chat@atomic_chat_hqNew Muse Glimmer 30B destroyed Gemma 4 31B at making retro arcade games! We gave three models the same task and compared one-shot outputs. Muse Glimmer 30B, Gemma 4 31B and Qwen3.6 27B each ran locally on its own RTX 5090 with 32GB VRAM Tasks: - Space Invaders - Tetris - Arkanoid with multiball Outputs: Muse Glimmer 30B: 83.4K tokens, 17.7 min Qwen3.6 27B: 23.7K tokens, 5.4 min Gemma 4 31B: 17.8K tokens, 4.5 min Glimmer's games play like the originals. The alien fleet speeds up with every kill, the blocks lock and lines clear, the bricks break. Nothing froze or crashed. Gemma broke on Tetris, its bot piles every piece against the left wall until the stack hits the ceiling with half the well empty. Qwen finished all three but some of its Arkanoid balls phase straight through the paddle. Run Muse Glimmer yourself in Atomic Chat from day 0!
Elon Musk@elonmuskAI 评分2525引用Luis Batalha@luismbatTesting Grok Imagine 2.0 against other image models: Prompt: "A mathematician drinking from an object of genus 1" ChatGPT gets trapped by the donut analogy: it turns a donut (genus 1) into a mug, accidentally creating an object of genus 2. Grok gets it right: a regular coffee mug already has genus 1.
MiniMax (official)@MiniMax_AIAI 评分3737引用antirez@antirezFast H3 implementation for Metal. Enjoy, modify, and so forth: https://github.com/antirez/h3.c Contains code from @liuliu which is welcomed in taking back whatever parts he likes for @drawthingsapp in case there are H3 plans there.
Google AI Developers@googleaidevsAI 评分3232
Ethan Mollick@emollickAI 评分3636Ethan Mollick 用同一提示词测试 Seedance 2.5,生成的太空游轮视频令人联想到乐观的未来太空书籍。他称赞该模型能出色处理窗户反射等细节,效果令人印象深刻。
引用fofr@fofrAIImagining a space cruise with Flux 3: > amateur handheld pov footage of a tourist in their plush and comfortable room of a space cruise, carpeted floor and comfy bed, large window shows a view of Saturn, you can see their reflection in the window, they turn off the light half way through so we can see outside better
Greg Brockman@gdbAI 评分3838引用Riley Brown@rileybrownLearn 99% of ChatGPT Work in 61 minutes: GPT Work is like Codex in the cloud. It works on phone, web, and desktop. And I've been using it to run my business. These are the 14 knowledge work capabilities. 00:00 Intro 03:18 #1 Presentations 09:16 #2 Plugins 17:36 #3 Blocks 23:34 #4 Websites & Apps & Hosting 30:09 #6 Branching Chats 31:51 #7 Desktop App (Cloud vs Local) 37:01 #8 Voice Mode 41:36 #9 Remote Voice Mode 45:52 #10 In-App Browser 48:50 #11 Skills 51:45 #12 Scheduled Automations 54:37 #13 Spreadsheets 56:58 #14 Multi-Agent Workspace 59:19 Final Review
jason@jxnlcoAI 评分3131
PixVerse@PixVerse_AI 评分1919运动装备的 AI 视频广告不需要打破物理规律的视觉特效。它们需要一个统一的视觉系统和六个连贯镜头,真正把产品卖出去。这支用 Seedance 2.0 制作的网球广告 ↓

Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_aiAI 评分4747
Greg Brockman@gdbAI 评分3636引用Trevin Chow@trevinUsed ChatGPT finance just now and asked it to find phantom subscriptions. It unearthed $550 a year of random things I didn’t realize I was paying for and thought I canceled. Thanks @OpenAI and whoever is on the Finance product.
Ethan Mollick@emollickAI 评分5454告诉 Codex 中的 Sol,我要和负责人对话:“我要你亲自处理所有事情,而不是你的智能体。别再把这个任务委派给更笨的智能体报告和复杂的测试框架了,它们会漏掉你一眼就能发现的问题。”
DogeDesigner@cb_dogeAI 评分1313
DogeDesigner@cb_dogeAI 评分4040突发:Grok Imagine Image 2.0 以 1439 分的 Arena 评分位列图像编辑模型第二名,超越 Meta、微软、谷歌和字节跳动的模型。
DogeDesigner@cb_dogeAI 评分4141Grok Imagine Image 2.0 在精准图像生成方面表现出色。 它能处理复杂布局、组织密集信息,甚至能以惊人准确度渲染小号文字。 以下是一些完全使用 Image 2.0 制作的信息图 👇
Greg Brockman@gdbAI 评分3939引用ARC Prize@arcprizeWe re-tested GPT-5.6 Luna from @OpenAI on ARC-AGI (Verified) following its recent 80% price reduction: - ARC-AGI-2: 59.6%, $0.18/task - ARC-AGI-1: 90.7%, $0.07/task The new results match Luna's original performance at a much lower cost.
DogeDesigner@cb_dogeAI 评分4949突发:Grok Imagine Image 2.0 以 1320 分的 Arena 评分位列文生图模型第二名,超越 Meta、Google、阿里巴巴、字节跳动等公司的模型。
lauren@potetoAI 评分1616你只需修复一切即可 [引用 @Baconbrix]:她在 Slack 里给我发的第一条消息是:@cursor_ai /pstack 调查并修复
引用Evan Bacon 🥓@BaconbrixHer first message to me in slack was: @cursor_ai /pstack investigate and fix
Nathan Lambert@natolambertAI 评分5757
Google DeepMind@GoogleDeepMindAI 评分2424我们与 Apollo 2 坐下来聊了聊在 Gemini Robotics 2 上运行的真实感受。🤖

MiniMax (official)@MiniMax_AIAI 评分5050开源权重四天后,社区就做出了通常是实验室才能交付的东西:一个知识蒸馏 LoRA,把采样步数从 20 步降到 4–8 步。 这就是我们开源的原因。🫡
引用⚡AI Search⚡@aisearchioIt's finally here! Minimax H3 Turbo lora makes generations 5x faster. Use only 4 steps instead of 20. https://huggingface.co/larryvrh/MiniMax-H3-Turbo-Lora Also see: https://huggingface.co/larryvrh/MiniMax-H3-Turbo-Lora/discussions/6
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_aiAI 评分4444Meta 的 Muse Spark 1.2 以每任务 $0.40 的成本登上 Artificial Analysis 帕累托前沿,在同等成本下无模型智能指数更高。
引用Artificial Analysis@ArtificialAnlysMuse Spark 1.2 places Meta on the Cost per Task Pareto frontier, scoring 6 points below Claude Opus 5 at ~1/6th of the cost At Meta's $1.25/$4.25 per 1M token pricing, Muse Spark 1.2 (xhigh) sits on the Pareto frontier of Intelligence Index vs Cost per Task. It delivers comparable intelligence to Claude Opus 4.8 (max, $2.03) at a fifth of the cost per task, and undercuts GPT-5.6 Sol (high, $0.55), GPT-5.6 Terra (max, $0.61), and Kimi K3 (max, $0.87). The nearest cheaper options are Grok 4.5 (high, $0.36) and GPT-5.6 Sol (medium, $0.37), and they all sit below it on the Index. The step up from Muse Spark 1.1 ($0.29 per task) comes at unchanged per-token pricing, with the increase driven by heavier token usage on agentic tasks.
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_aiAI 评分3434
引用AI/ML API@aimlapiGrok 4.5 just beat Kimi K3 at 13x cheaper price! $0.15 vs $1.98 — same task, same prompt, one shot. We'll miss Nikita Bier — the best Head of Product X ever had. So we had four models honor him the only way AI can: by building a 3D plush Nikita Boar in his signature suit 🐗 Cost per figure: Grok 4.5 — $0.15 GPT 5.6 Sol — $0.60 Qwen 3.8 Max — $0.67 Kimi K3 — $1.98 Kimi spent ~19 minutes thinking and billed 13x more. Grok just shipped. Everyone argues about which model is smartest. Nobody checks the receipt. And then we made the hogs dance with Grok 🕺 All four models, one API key — AI/ML API, 1000+ models.
Google AI Developers@googleaidevsAI 评分3030
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_aiAI 评分3939一个关于 Claude 的野生故事 他在工作中丢失了手机,但因为公司禁用了“查找我的手机”功能,无法使用。 于是 Claude 编写了一个小程序,通过测量蓝牙信号强度,让他循着信号找到了设备。

Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_aiAI 评分4848中国的人形机器人在传统武术场地上完成了韦伯斯特空翻和侧空翻动作。 实时平衡算法让这台55公斤的机器在整个套路中保持稳定。
