跳到正文
8月11日周二
  1. Rohan Paul42

    Meta 开源 Muse Glimmer 30B,在 aimlapi 上以 $0.02 成本一次生成 5 个可运行游戏,约为 Muse Spark 1.2($0.11)的五分之一。Glimmer 在 Flappy Bird 上表现更优,但赛车游戏仍有失误且画质较粗糙。该模型为 29.6B 稠密模型,由 Muse Spark 蒸馏而来,支持 131K+ 上下文,量化版小于 20GB。

    引用AI/ML API@aimlapi

    Muse Glimmer one-shot 5 games! @AIatMeta dropped Muse Glimmer. So we ran it against Muse Spark 1.2, on five one-file game demos, each one written to play itself: Tetris, a top-down pixel street race, a rooftop web-slinger, a blue hedgehog platformer, and Flappy Bird. the setup: • Muse Glimmer 30B — via aimlapi[.]com. cost: $0.02 • Muse Spark 1.2 — via aimlapi[.]com. cost: $0.11 what we saw: • every Glimmer scene runs and plays itself. it's a reasoning model, so it burns more tokens — but the output is clean. its Tetris even scores each placement to keep lines clearing, and the blocks burst into pixels on every clear. • Glimmer beat Spark at Flappy Bird — its bird flew through the pipes cleaner. • but it's not perfect: in the racing game its cars sometimes slip off the road, and its graphics are simpler and blockier than Spark's. glad to see Meta back in open source — and we're waiting for Spark 1.2 weights next 🙌

  2. MiniMax (official)35

    MiniMax H3 开源视频模型发布首日即获 Sol Engine 加速,4.5 小时内实现端到端推理速度较 Diffusers 提升 3.95 倍、较 SGLang 提升 2.80 倍。加速方案结合内核融合、跨步缓存与 Sol-Attn 免训练稀疏注意力,无需蒸馏或微调。

    引用Enze Xie@xieenze_jr

    🚀 MiniMax H3, accelerated on Day 1 with Sol Engine! Within just 4.5 hours, our agent-native Sol Video Inference Engine achieved: ⚡ 3.95× end-to-end speedup over Diffusers ⚡ 2.80× speedup over SGLang 🎬 8× NVIDIA GB200, 1344×768, 24 FPS, 124 frames The acceleration combines kernel fusion and graph capture, cross-step caching, and training-free sparse attention powered by Sol-Attn—with no distillation, fine-tuning, LoRA, or offline calibration. We are especially excited to see a powerful open-weight model like MiniMax H3 released to the community. Open models are essential for pushing video generation research, systems optimization, and real-world deployment forward. We hope this is the beginning of a much more vibrant open-source video generation ecosystem—and Sol Engine will keep working to make the latest models faster and easier to deploy from day one. 🔗https://nvlabs.github.io/Sana/Sol-Engine/H3/

  3. Ant Ling40

    蚂蚁百灵 Ling-3.0-flash 124B 在单台 DGX Spark 上实现 38.7 tok/s(官方 int4 量化),社区 GGUF 为 35.2 tok/s,速度达 DeepSeek V4 Flash 同硬件成绩的 2.4 倍。该模型支持完整 256K 上下文,并能在智能体循环中一次性写出可运行代码,被评测者视为单机最快的 124B 级本地模型。

    引用Sudo su@sudoingX

    ive been playing with @AntLingAGI's ling 3.0 flash 124b for a week now, and i need to publish some numbers and performance i found valuable from this lab. a week ago the weights dropped. since then, on one dgx spark, i benched the community quant ladder, ran every official quant to ground, took the official int4 from doesn't run to the fastest single dgx spark path, watched the model write working software in one shot through an agent loop, and served its full 256K context. everything measured the same way and public, nothing tuned to flatter anyone. the verdict: ling 3.0 flash earned a permanent seat on my box. it's the fastest 124B class path i've measured on a single spark, 38.7 tok/s on the official int4 recipe, 35.2 on the community gguf, 2.4x what deepseek v4 flash does on the same hardware, and it writes correct code on the first pass often enough to feel like a different class of local model. dive with me into the full week of receipts, quant by quant, curve by curve 👇

  4. Rohan Paul40

    Meta 开源 Muse Glimmer-30B 在三个街机游戏生成任务中击败 Gemma 4 31B。测试在 Atomic Chat 桌面应用本地运行,每模型各用一块 RTX 5090(32GB VRAM)。Glimmer 游戏还原度高,但代价高昂:耗 83.4K tokens、17.7 分钟,而 Gemma 仅 17.8K tokens、4.5 分钟。

    引用atomic.chat@atomic_chat_hq

    New Muse Glimmer 30B destroyed Gemma 4 31B at making retro arcade games! We gave three models the same task and compared one-shot outputs. Muse Glimmer 30B, Gemma 4 31B and Qwen3.6 27B each ran locally on its own RTX 5090 with 32GB VRAM Tasks: - Space Invaders - Tetris - Arkanoid with multiball Outputs: Muse Glimmer 30B: 83.4K tokens, 17.7 min Qwen3.6 27B: 23.7K tokens, 5.4 min Gemma 4 31B: 17.8K tokens, 4.5 min Glimmer's games play like the originals. The alien fleet speeds up with every kill, the blocks lock and lines clear, the bricks break. Nothing froze or crashed. Gemma broke on Tetris, its bot piles every piece against the left wall until the stack hits the ceiling with half the well empty. Qwen finished all three but some of its Arkanoid balls phase straight through the paddle. Run Muse Glimmer yourself in Atomic Chat from day 0!

  5. Elon Musk25

    Grok 太强了

    引用Luis Batalha@luismbat

    Testing Grok Imagine 2.0 against other image models: Prompt: "A mathematician drinking from an object of genus 1" ChatGPT gets trapped by the donut analogy: it turns a donut (genus 1) into a mug, accidentally creating an object of genus 2. Grok gets it right: a regular coffee mug already has genus 1.

  6. MiniMax (official)37

    MiniMax 开源 H3 模型权重后,Redis 作者 antirez 为其编写了面向 Mac 的 Metal 推理引擎,并已在 GitHub 开源。MiniMax 表示,开放权重让任何人能将 H3 带到任意硬件,并感谢 antirez 的贡献。

    引用antirez@antirez

    Fast H3 implementation for Metal. Enjoy, modify, and so forth: https://github.com/antirez/h3.c Contains code from @liuliu which is welcomed in taking back whatever parts he likes for @drawthingsapp in case there are H3 plans there.

8月10日周一
  1. Ethan Mollick36

    Ethan Mollick 用同一提示词测试 Seedance 2.5,生成的太空游轮视频令人联想到乐观的未来太空书籍。他称赞该模型能出色处理窗户反射等细节,效果令人印象深刻。

    引用fofr@fofrAI

    Imagining a space cruise with Flux 3: > amateur handheld pov footage of a tourist in their plush and comfortable room of a space cruise, carpeted floor and comfy bed, large window shows a view of Saturn, you can see their reflection in the window, they turn off the light half way through so we can see outside better

  2. Greg Brockman38

    Greg Brockman 分享如何学习使用 ChatGPT Work。该工具被形容为云端版 Codex,支持手机、网页和桌面端,可用于运营业务。教程涵盖演示文稿、插件、Blocks、网站与应用托管、分支对话、语音模式、技能、定时自动化、电子表格及多智能体工作区等 14 项知识工作能力。

    引用Riley Brown@rileybrown

    Learn 99% of ChatGPT Work in 61 minutes: GPT Work is like Codex in the cloud. It works on phone, web, and desktop. And I've been using it to run my business. These are the 14 knowledge work capabilities. 00:00 Intro 03:18 #1 Presentations 09:16 #2 Plugins 17:36 #3 Blocks 23:34 #4 Websites & Apps & Hosting 30:09 #6 Branching Chats 31:51 #7 Desktop App (Cloud vs Local) 37:01 #8 Voice Mode 41:36 #9 Remote Voice Mode 45:52 #10 In-App Browser 48:50 #11 Skills 51:45 #12 Scheduled Automations 54:37 #13 Spreadsheets 56:58 #14 Multi-Agent Workspace 59:19 Final Review

8月9日周日
  1. Greg Brockman36

    ChatGPT Finance 用于帮你省钱:

    引用Trevin Chow@trevin

    Used ChatGPT finance just now and asked it to find phantom subscriptions. It unearthed $550 a year of random things I didn’t realize I was paying for and thought I canceled. Thanks @OpenAI and whoever is on the Finance product.

8月8日周六
8月7日周五
  1. MiniMax (official)50

    开源权重四天后,社区就做出了通常是实验室才能交付的东西:一个知识蒸馏 LoRA,把采样步数从 20 步降到 4–8 步。 这就是我们开源的原因。🫡

    引用⚡AI Search⚡@aisearchio

    It's finally here! Minimax H3 Turbo lora makes generations 5x faster. Use only 4 steps instead of 20. https://huggingface.co/larryvrh/MiniMax-H3-Turbo-Lora Also see: https://huggingface.co/larryvrh/MiniMax-H3-Turbo-Lora/discussions/6

  2. Rohan Paul44

    Meta 的 Muse Spark 1.2 以每任务 $0.40 的成本登上 Artificial Analysis 帕累托前沿,在同等成本下无模型智能指数更高。

    引用Artificial Analysis@ArtificialAnlys

    Muse Spark 1.2 places Meta on the Cost per Task Pareto frontier, scoring 6 points below Claude Opus 5 at ~1/6th of the cost At Meta's $1.25/$4.25 per 1M token pricing, Muse Spark 1.2 (xhigh) sits on the Pareto frontier of Intelligence Index vs Cost per Task. It delivers comparable intelligence to Claude Opus 4.8 (max, $2.03) at a fifth of the cost per task, and undercuts GPT-5.6 Sol (high, $0.55), GPT-5.6 Terra (max, $0.61), and Kimi K3 (max, $0.87). The nearest cheaper options are Grok 4.5 (high, $0.36) and GPT-5.6 Sol (medium, $0.37), and they all sit below it on the Index. The step up from Muse Spark 1.1 ($0.29 per task) comes at unchanged per-token pricing, with the increase driven by heavier token usage on agentic tasks.

  3. Rohan Paul34

    AI/ML API 用同一提示词、一次性任务对比四款模型生成 3D 玩偶的成本:Grok 4.5 仅 $0.15,GPT 5.6 Sol 为 $0.60,Qwen 3.8 Max 为 $0.67,而 Kimi K3 高达 $1.98。Kimi 思考约 19 分钟,费用是 Grok 的 13 倍。对生产级智能体而言,单次任务完成成本正变得比单 token 价格更重要。

    引用AI/ML API@aimlapi

    Grok 4.5 just beat Kimi K3 at 13x cheaper price! $0.15 vs $1.98 — same task, same prompt, one shot. We'll miss Nikita Bier — the best Head of Product X ever had. So we had four models honor him the only way AI can: by building a 3D plush Nikita Boar in his signature suit 🐗 Cost per figure: Grok 4.5 — $0.15 GPT 5.6 Sol — $0.60 Qwen 3.8 Max — $0.67 Kimi K3 — $1.98 Kimi spent ~19 minutes thinking and billed 13x more. Grok just shipped. Everyone argues about which model is smartest. Nobody checks the receipt. And then we made the hogs dance with Grok 🕺 All four models, one API key — AI/ML API, 1000+ models.

8月6日周四