Meta 开源 Muse Glimmer 30B，在 aimlapi 上以 $0.02 成本一次生成 5 个可运行游戏，约为 Muse Spark 1.2（$0.11）的五分之一。Glimmer 在 Flappy Bird 上表现更优，但赛车游戏仍有失误且画质较粗糙。该模型为 29.6B 稠密模型，由 Muse Spark 蒸馏而来，支持 131K+ 上下文，量化版小于 20GB。
Meta's open-sourced Muse Glimmer 30B vs Muse Spark 1.2
Glimmer delivered 5 runnable games at roughly one-fifth Muse Spark's cost.
Very Interesting experiment by @aimlapi .
the setup:
• Muse Glimmer 30B — via aimlapi[.]com. cost: $0.02
• Muse Spark 1.2 — via aimlapi[.]com. cost: $0.11
Glimmer still made mistakes, especially in the racing game, and Spark produced better-looking graphics.
Meta built Glimmer as a 29.6B dense model distilled from Muse Spark for local agentic and coding work.
Its model card lists 131K+ context and quantized versions under 20GB, sized for 24GB or 32GB consumer hardware.
Muse Glimmer one-shot 5 games! @AIatMeta dropped Muse Glimmer. So we ran it against Muse Spark 1.2, on five one-file game demos, each one written to play itself: Tetris, a top-down pixel street race, a rooftop web-slinger, a blue hedgehog platformer, and Flappy Bird. the setup: • Muse Glimmer 30B — via aimlapi[.]com. cost: $0.02 • Muse Spark 1.2 — via aimlapi[.]com. cost: $0.11 what we saw: • every Glimmer scene runs and plays itself. it's a reasoning model, so it burns more tokens — but the output is clean. its Tetris even scores each placement to keep lines clearing, and the blocks burst into pixels on every clear. • Glimmer beat Spark at Flappy Bird — its bird flew through the pipes cleaner. • but it's not perfect: in the racing game its cars sometimes slip off the road, and its graphics are simpler and blockier than Spark's. glad to see Meta back in open source — and we're waiting for Spark 1.2 weights next 🙌在 X 查看被引用的帖子
来源：Rohan Paul · x.com