Meta 的 Muse Spark 1.2 以每任务 $0.40 的成本登上 Artificial Analysis 帕累托前沿，在同等成本下无模型智能指数更高。
Muse Spark 1.2 puts Meta on Artificial Analysis's Pareto frontier at $0.40 per task.
i.e. on that frontier, no model in the comparison is simultaneously cheaper per task and higher on the Intelligence Index.
Muse Spark 1.2 also reaches roughly Claude Opus 4.8-level intelligence at about one-fifth of that model's $2.03 task cost.
It scores 6 Index points below Claude Opus 5 while costing roughly one-sixth as much.
The metric goes beyond just the list price because Artificial Analysis weights the input, cache, reasoning, and answer tokens actually consumed across its nine Index evaluations.
This is so significant because for long-running agents, small cost differences compound across model calls, reasoning tokens, tool steps, and retries.
Muse Spark 1.2 places Meta on the Cost per Task Pareto frontier, scoring 6 points below Claude Opus 5 at ~1/6th of the cost At Meta's $1.25/$4.25 per 1M token pricing, Muse Spark 1.2 (xhigh) sits on the Pareto frontier of Intelligence Index vs Cost per Task. It delivers comparable intelligence to Claude Opus 4.8 (max, $2.03) at a fifth of the cost per task, and undercuts GPT-5.6 Sol (high, $0.55), GPT-5.6 Terra (max, $0.61), and Kimi K3 (max, $0.87). The nearest cheaper options are Grok 4.5 (high, $0.36) and GPT-5.6 Sol (medium, $0.37), and they all sit below it on the Index. The step up from Muse Spark 1.1 ($0.29 per task) comes at unchanged per-token pricing, with the increase driven by heavier token usage on agentic tasks.在 X 查看被引用的帖子
来源：Rohan Paul · x.com