Meta 分享数学家与 Muse Spark 1.1 和 Muse Spark 1.2(Thinking Mode)在 meta.ai 普通聊天界面下协作完成的六篇论文,面向无现成解法的开放数学问题,未使用定制研究脚手架。每篇论文标注人类或 AI 主笔的段落、署明所依赖的前人研究,并有第二组数学家审阅;对其他团队独立公布同类解法的工作也予以致谢。
原文说明了协作方式和论文标注原则,读者可以据此了解 Meta 如何让模型参与真正开放的数学研究问题。
Following gold-medal-level performance from our AI models across five competitions in mathematics, physics, and chemistry, we asked a harder question: can AI contribute when a problem is genuinely open and without an existing solution path?
Over the past several months, mathematicians worked with Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Spark 1.2 in Thinking Mode through the regular http://meta.ai chat interface, with no custom research scaffold, to find solutions to such problems.
Our goal wasn't to mass-produce papers, but empower researchers. Every collaboration followed the same principles: mathematicians guided the research, a second group of mathematicians then reviewed the work, each paper marks which passages were drafted primarily by humans or AI, and each credits the prior research it builds on. Where other teams independently announced solutions to the same problems, we acknowledge their work as well.
Today, we're sharing six papers from that collaboration.
🧵👇
来源:AI at Meta · x.com