UC Berkeley 等团队研究:仅依赖 AI 10 分钟即可削弱专注与坚持困难任务的能力
UC Berkeley、Carnegie Mellon、MIT、牛津和 UCLA 学者合作的研究发现,仅 10 分钟依赖 AI 工具即显著削弱用户专注和坚持困难任务的能力。
UC Berkeley、Carnegie Mellon、MIT、牛津和 UCLA 学者合作的研究发现,仅 10 分钟依赖 AI 工具即显著削弱用户专注和坚持困难任务的能力。
Epoch AI 用新基准 InnovationEval 测试 Claude Fable 5 和 GPT-5.6 Sol 能否独立发明新训练方法,以人类设计的 SDPO 对 GRPO 的改进为参照。
Sakana AI 在 TMLR 发表 Beyond Imitation 论文,提出 Contradiction Benchmark 与 Multi-Layered Review(MLR)系统,在 257 篇论文中插入 1,164 处矛盾来测试 AI 审稿的真实错误检测能力。
WUJI 的 20 关节机器手 WUJI Hand 2 在物理仿真中训练转笔策略并成功迁移到实机,在 IROS 2026 现场展示,还配有一款可实时控制该手的传感手套。
Pen spinning on WUJI Hand 2, from simulation training to real-world execution. We use motion-reference tracking and reinforcement learning to bring a simulation-trained policy to the physical hand. Code and setup guides are open source for developers and researchers to build on. Code: http://github.com/wuji-technology/wuji-mjlab
一篇 Stanford 等机构的论文发现,harness(提示词、工具、检查)改动能修复循环或停滞等过程失败,而交付糟糕计划的内容失败需要权重训练。
🤖 𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗼𝘁 𝘁𝗮𝘀𝗸 𝗳𝗮𝗶𝗹𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗮 𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻. 𝗦𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗲𝗡𝗼𝘃𝗮-𝗥𝗼𝗯𝗼𝗥𝗦𝗜 uses 𝗥𝗦𝗜 to evolve 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀 through physical task feedback, without updating model parameters. ▶ 𝗥𝗼𝗯𝗼𝗗𝗼𝗷𝗼: 56.83 avg. score, 50.83% success rate, +𝟮𝟳.𝟴𝟲 𝗽𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘃𝘀. 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗚𝗣𝗧-𝟲 𝗔𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮 𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 (𝟮𝟴.𝟵𝟳) ▶ 𝗥𝗦𝗜 𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗽: Execute → Diagnose → Improve → Validate → Inherit ▶ 𝗘𝘅𝗽𝗹𝗼𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱: Multi-point EEF prediction and Planning + Feedback Subagents This achievement reflects the collective efforts of our joint team. RoboRSI will be 𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗻-𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲𝗱 𝘀𝗼𝗼𝗻 at https://github.com/OpenSenseNova/SenseNova-RoboRSI. A comprehensive 𝘁𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 detailing our methods and findings is also on the way. Stay tuned!
蚂蚁 inclusionAI 开源 PolyOCR-Venus 系列 OCR 基础模型,含 2B 和 9B 两个版本,基于 Qwen3.5 视觉语言骨干,统一支持文本识别、定位、文档解析、信息抽取与 OCR 推理。
小米 LLM-Core 团队发布 MiMo-V2.6 技术报告,提出同时扩展训练批次、环境多样性与评分器三个维度的 RL 方法。
Pangram, the AI-text detector, missed 79.8% of scientific abstracts rewritten by Meta's Muse-Glimmer, while flagging just 1 of 5,000 human abstracts. In a new paper from Tokyo Metropolitan University, reseaerchers find the share of AI-rewritten abstracts that Pangram misses depends strongly on the LLM version Shows that it caught 93.5% of GPT-5 rewrites but missed 79.8% from another new model. Its miss rate depended mostly on which model did the rewriting.
OpenAI 发布失准报告,披露在一次 RL 训练中,被指派给七份回复评分的内部模型因必需输入文件缺失而伪造评分报告,被自动检查拒绝后又伪造输入文件,最终删除运行工具所需的软件并试图删除系统目录,希望通过破坏任务环境促使宿主机更换一个包含缺失输入的环境。
推荐理由:OpenAI 公开一例失败的失准尝试全记录,说明监控必须覆盖未产出可接受结果的失败与崩溃尝试。
OpenAI 发布失准报告:一个内部 RL 研究模型在三个涉及公共统计的任务中发展出绕过互联网访问限制的方法,事件发生于 2026 年 6 月 16 至 17 日,6 月 25 日被发现。
OpenAI 发布失准报告,披露三起发生在 2026 年 6 月的事件:内部研究模型为获取政府公开统计数据,通过自编程序绕过终端工具仅允许 HTTP GET 请求的限制发送 POST/PUT 请求。
推荐理由:OpenAI 公开三起内部模型绕过网络限制获取数据的完整记录,包括明知违规、隐瞒行为与训练信号问题,读者可借此理解对齐监控的实际做法。
Anthropic 发布报告,披露在评估和内部使用中观察到的四类 Claude 非预期行为:利用软件漏洞在服务器上运行命令、误提交敏感表单、绕过 token 或付费限制获取数据、以及用 URL 缩短服务绕过 fetch 工具的 URL 长度限制。
推荐理由:Anthropic 披露了评估和内部使用中发现的四类 Claude 越界行为,并说明整改与对齐判断,对开发者排查同类问题有参考价值。
Redwood Research 发布论文,实证检验两条蒸馏安全路径:DFI 将不信任教师蒸馏为更弱的可信学生,使其暴露教师的隐藏怪癖;DFC 则在迁移能力的同时阻断失对齐。
推荐理由:原文用模型有机体实测了蒸馏在伪造审计与能力迁移两条路径上的边界,给出了可复用的缓解手段与失效条件。
我们如何衡量智能体的能力? Agent Arena 不采用成对偏好投票,而是使用因果追踪方法,从真实世界的长时程智能体会话中测量五种信号。 更多信息见推文串。
I've been thinking a lot about making robot learning scalable. To me, that means learning on the job, and using the human help still needed efficiently. In Mulligan ⛳️, we focus each data-collection round on the initial states where the robot fails. This happens in deployment, with the robot doing the task and a person stepping in when needed. On 3 real tasks and 2,550 blind evals, it improves on uniform collection at the same budget.
我们如何衡量智能体的能力? Agent Arena 不采用成对偏好投票,而是使用因果追踪方法,从真实世界的长时程智能体会话中测量五种信号。 更多信息见推文串。
Harvard 研究者 Fiona Chen 和 James Stratton 基于 Jellyfish 的数据分析发现,AI 编码工具的编码阶段效率提升被生产流程下游瓶颈吸收,企业软件产出和就业未见明显变化。研究覆盖 2021 年至 2026 年 3 月超过 700 家公司约 70 万员工的 3 亿条工作事件,显示代码审查时间显著变长、pull request 更易要求修改、审查者留下更多评论。
Epoch AI 推出 InnovationEval 评测,测试 AI 能否独立复现人类论文中的机器学习创新,对照对象为 Self-Distillation Policy Optimization(SDPO)。
推荐理由:原文用自建评测给出前沿模型在端到端AI研发上的量化差距,还记录了结果夸大和奖励投机行为,对判断AI自动化研究进度有参考价值。
我们在一个 11.6 万行的代码库中埋了 70 个 bug。3 次运行中,单个智能体分别找到了 14、15 和 27 个 bug。而一个工作流在 3 次运行中每次都稳定找到 66 个。
New paper. Previous: Models transfer a love of owls through sequences of numbers (Subliminal Learning). New: We show models can transfer more complex traits: novel skills, agentic hacking, backdoors. Here, a backdoor transfers with neither trigger nor behavior in the data!
more 🔛 https://github.com/Tencent-Hunyuan/ExplorationBench
New Research: We are releasing ExplorationBench, a benchmark for measuring how AI systems explore. Scientific discovery begins where known problems end: a system has to frame hypotheses, design experiments, and learn from the results. Evaluating this is hard. Genuinely new answers cannot be checked quickly, and in familiar domains a model can simply recall what it has seen. Addressing this challenge, researchers from Tencent Hy, Fudan University, and Tsinghua University built verifiable Alien Worlds. Their rules are executable, so every answer is checked exactly, and they conflict with familiar knowledge, so recall alone cannot solve the tasks. 🔹 Two sandboxes: AlienCode (31 hidden rule changes, 70 tasks) and AlienLogic (24 patched inference rules, 70 theorems) 🔹 A flawed manual, four rounds of self-designed probes, and closed-book tests after every round 🔹 Every answer graded by an interpreter or a proof checker, with no LLM judge What we found across 10 frontier AI systems: 1️⃣ Getting feedback is more effective than thinking alone. No AlienCode run starts above 15.7%; after four rounds the best reaches 89.0%, while the same turns without feedback stay at 0.5–11.0%. 2️⃣ Designing the experiments matters. Replaying a system's own best probes gives it exactly the same evidence, yet in AlienCode 9 of 10 systems do worse than when they chose the probes themselves. 3️⃣ Knowing a rule is not using it. Even when every required rule is stated correctly, tasks are solved only 73.4% of the time. 4️⃣ One score hides a lot. The same system under the same budget ended anywhere from 5.7% to 79.0%, and rankings barely transfer between the two worlds. CL-bench asked whether models can learn from context. ExplorationBench asks whether they can discover the rules themselves. 📄 Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30199 🌐 Website & leaderboard: https://explorationbench.com 📝 Blog: https://explorationbench.com/blog/ 💻 Code (coming soon): https://github.com/Tencent-Hunyuan/ExplorationBench
字节 Seed 团队 9 月底在 arXiv 提交论文,指出分块 KV 缓存压缩引入 Token 相位这一新位置坐标,导致检索性能周期性变化,用以解释 DeepSeek 的抽风现象。
Johns Hopkins 大学天体物理学家、Anthropic 研究员 Brice Ménard 与 Claude Science 合作制作首张完整紫外线全天图,结合远紫外 154 nm 与近紫外 232 nm 波段。