跳到正文
Rohan Paul· @rohanpaul_ai · X·· 56 分钟前AI 评分45
AI 导读

Google 新论文发现,与会反驳的 AI 队友练习的学生写出的商业计划优于使用普通 AI 工具的学生。研究基于 Google Research 平台 Vantage,AI 队友由 Gemini 3.1 Pro 驱动,会提出有缺陷的想法、表达分歧并陈述错误说法,但不替学生完成任务。

正文 · 原文

New Google paper finds that students who practiced with AI teammates that push back wrote better business plans than students using normal AI tools.

Skills like critical thinking and collaboration matter for starting a business, but they are hard to teach and hard to practice at scale.

They extended Vantage, a Google Research platform where students solve business tasks in chat with AI teammates run by Gemini 3.1 Pro. The teammates pitch flawed ideas, disagree, and state false claims, but never do the task for the student.

In a trial with 52 students, the Vantage group averaged 67.6% on the final business plan, versus 60.5% for controls using standard AI tools. Students who did 5 to 6 practice tasks averaged 79.7%, while those who did none scored 59.3%.

If you build AI for learning, make it a teammate that challenges people, not an assistant that finishes their work.

来源:Rohan Paul · x.com