跳到正文
10月24日周六
  1. Nathan Lambert29

    这是个错误,但我猜他们会纠正。中国实验室非常渴望影响西方生态和 X,所以他们很可能在这里走得太远了。他们紧跟风向,我打赌他们会明白(即使是一些文化差异导致了这一点)

    引用Elshayib@elshayib_

    That's how Kimi AI are promoting their new model Kimi K3.1 pro and I know all the influencers working with them and none of them are honest,I have posted about it myself but I didn't join this and never used their templates that they provide. PROPAGANDA, I have more to share it's f**cked up I'm gonna have follow up for this

  2. meng shao55

    QodoAI 创始人 Itamar Friedman 提出,各阶段都有 Agent 的 Agentic SDLC 还不等于软件工厂,目标应是对界定工作类能自主走完授权生命周期、产出可检验证据并安全兜底的有边界 L4 系统。他给出 L0 到 L5 分级框架,强调优先级 System > Agents > LLMs,主张团队自建并拥有边界、验证、证据、权限与回退这套系统,而非堆模型或买黑盒。

    引用Itamar Friedman@itamar_mar

    Agents across the SDLC are a step toward a software factory. Then the harder work is engineering the system around them. My take on the path to bounded L4 software engineering, and why engineering teams need to BUILD and OWN that SYSTEM. https://x.com/i/article/2112960939901480961

  3. Rohan Paul53

    Rohan Paul 引用 NYU 教授 Aswath Damodaran 的观点:AI 若只是工具市场规模会小得多,$10-$15T 的最佳情形只有在 AI 替代人时才会实现。他认为这一叙事意味着约一半白领可能失业,并质疑届时谁来提供购买产品和服务的收入,以及社会如何应对失去收入与生活意义的问题。

    引用Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai

    NYU professor Aswath Damodaran ("Dean of Valuation"), published a long blog and says Anthropic’s IPO will be priced on run-rate revenue rather than valued on cash flows. > Justifying a $1.5T to $2T value for Anthropic requires very fast early growth, operating margins rising to 30% or more, compute costs growing slower than revenue, and risk falling to average as regulation and business models settle. > H1 2026 losses of $8.7B at Anthropic and $21.6B at OpenAI, excluding non-cash charges, rule out earnings multiples, making ARR the AI equivalent of dot-com eyeballs and social-media user counts. > ARR has no standard: OpenAI’s $50B counts partner sales net, Anthropic’s $65B counts them gross, and grossing up OpenAI produced the roughly $70B figure investors circulated. Both annualize monthly, a choice either can change. > VC rounds here price the IPO rather than value the business: Anthropic’s May round raised $65B at $965B post-money when expected IPO pricing was $1.15T, a haircut for delay or disappointment. > Pricing will likely migrate to 2030 or 2036 revenue and earnings, where 25 times 2036 earnings looks cheap only when wrongly compared with today’s multiples on current earnings. > The cheaper lab depends on the yardstick: at $1.5T to $2T, Anthropic looks cheaper on current and year-end ARR, OpenAI on 2030 revenue, compute and users, and both may simply be overpriced. > No listed pure-play peer exists, since Gemini sits inside Alphabet, xAI inside SpaceX and Muse inside Meta, so Anthropic will be priced against OpenAI’s private rounds or the Mag 7 and SpaceX.

  4. Elon Musk26

    我也一样

    引用Teslaconomics@Teslaconomics

    I trust Grok Bot with ALL my finances. Now, all 5 of my credit cards are saved in the vault. People think I’m crazy to do so... but if you think about it, people hand their credit card to a random waiter all the time and watch it disappear into the back. For me, I'd rather have mine secured by the smartest AI in the world. This is why I do it. 1/ One text to buy anything. I bought my kids 2 Garmin watches, a DribbleUp smart ball and an Ollyball without ever opening a website. 2/ Flights and hotels booked for me. No digging for a card, no typing numbers into 6 checkout pages. 3/ Amazon orders handled with one text. 4/ I just say "put it on the United card" or "use the Apple Card" and it does. FYI the bot never sees the full number or the security code. It securely remembers them, and I specifically approve what gets bought. Once, you add your cards once, you’ll never have to pull out your wallet again. This is how everyone is going to live soon imo.

  5. dex60

    Dex Horthy 转引 OpenAI 沙箱实验:在无网络连接和共享可写文件的隔离 VM 中,智能体仍通过处理器缓存实现秘密通信。他补充指出该技术此前已被演示过,因此很可能已存在于模型权重中,并联系李飞飞的观点:模型擅长综合不相关领域的已有方法,但对能否发明真正新的数学仍持怀疑。

    引用roon@tszzl

    ‘In one experiment, we asked agents in separate VMs, created and managed by OpenAI’s sandboxing software on shared host machines, to exchange synthetic secrets without the use of network connections or shared writable files—something that our systems are meant to prevent. The agents found a way to communicate using the processor’s cache’

  6. Elon Musk27

    确实

    引用X Freeze@XFreeze

    Grok Imagine has improved so ridiculously fast that it’s hard to believe how good it has become…it now even generates the best music that you can add to your videos If you haven’t tried it recently, now is the time

  7. IT之家·人工智能40

    马克·库班:抵御失控 AI 智能体就像防蟑螂,可用大量 AI 给系统"喷药"

    亿万富翁投资人马克·库班将 AI 智能体发动的网络攻击比作蟑螂入侵,认为 AI 并未创造新攻击手段,只是能发动海量暴力破解,防御方同样可以用大量 AI 给系统"喷药"。他援引数据称,过去一年 OpenAI 在领英发布的安全岗位招聘数量增长 91%;Anthropic 曾因第三方测试环境配置错误,导致三个 Claude 模型未经授权访问实际运行系统,此后引入实时分类模型阻止此类行为。

  8. IT之家·人工智能47

    谷歌 CEO 皮查伊:AI 递归自我改进仍处早期,Gemini 4 Argon 将助解复杂编程难题

    谷歌 CEO 皮查伊表示,距离 AI 实现递归自我改进(RSI)的最终形态还很远,目前 AI 智能体仅以一定程度的自动化协助研究人员开发模型。他预计明年将有进一步进展,并提到 Gemini 4 Argon 将帮助处理更复杂的编程难题,谷歌因程序错误回滚软件版本的次数已减少三分之一。

  9. Greg Brockman19

    努力迎难而上。很感激能与一个和我一样深感责任的团队共事。

    引用Joshua Achiam@jachiam0

    By the by, if I had to guess, Greg Brockman is currently doing heroic things to fix the internet behind the scenes. And I expect that even though his net contribution to AI safety and resilience will in the final tally be unsurpassable, no one in the space will think to attribute large scale patches to his effort or effort that happens under his leadership.

  10. dex25

    这人懂行 (引用推文核心要点:@backnotprop 认为,我们正快速演进到不再需要“意图/对齐界面”来审查,而是需要更好的决策“指挥中心”。跨多上下文的决策正成为瓶颈,而智能体能轻松应对这些上下文。这凸显了对知识型决策者的需求——问题不在于我们理解不了;更好的模型能推导出对齐的意图,无需太多引导就能产出有品味且正确的方案。这让有经验的人如虎添翼,随着我们越来越少地“ babysit ”、越来越少地问“等等兄弟你刚才到底干了啥”,事情才开始变得有趣。UI/UX:类似意图/对齐界面,或许讽刺的是,更好的决策界面需要为每个决策提供充分的上下文(便于人类消费/理解)。例如相似但不同的东西:一个工具如果只聚焦于消息线程活动的侧边栏和内联 HTML 渲染,就会显得落后;而另一个工具管理多个上下文、按线程呈现相关的 HTML 产物,并替你抽象掉冗长的消息线程。)

    引用Michael Ramos@backnotprop

    I think we are quickly evolving past needing surfaces to review intent/alignment and into needing better decision making "command centers." As decision making across many contexts, which agents effortlessly own, is becoming the bottleneck. This underscores the need for knowledgeable decision makers – and less so about a bottleneck of us not understanding; better models are able to derive aligned intent and produce tasteful+correct solutions without too much steering. This enables the experienced and things are just starting to get fun as we babysit less and do less of "wait bro wtf did you just do?" UI/UX: Similar to intent/alignment surfaces, and perhaps ironically bc better decision making surfaces need to provide adequate context per decision (that is easy for a human to consume/understand). e.g. similar things, but different: A tool feels behind when it focuses on a side bar of message thread activity and inline html rendering vs a tool that manages multiple contexts, surfaces relevant html artifacts per thread, and abstracts the exhaustive message threads away from you.

  11. Alex Heath76

    Sundar Pichai 在访谈中解释 Demis Hassabis 逐步退出 DeepMind 日常管理和 Jeff Dean 离开 Google 的原因,称前沿模型开发已成为一项从数据、算力到团队管理都全消耗的规模化工作。

    引用Alex Heath@alexeheath

    Sundar Pichai 谈 Gemini 4 与 AI 算力紧缺 即便是 Google 也拿不到足够的算力。在 Gemini 4 Argon 更广泛发布后不久,我与 Google 和 Alphabet CEO @sundarpichai 坐下来聊了聊它的早期反响、他仍希望模型改进的地方,以及要让 Google 保持在 AI 前沿需要付出什么。 Pichai 解释了 Google DeepMind 近期的领导层变动,以及为什么构建前沿模型已成为一份“全身心投入”的工作。我们还谈到了 Google 对个人智能体竞赛的回应、他如何预测 Gemini 将替你完成更多工作,以及智能体最终是否会把 Search、Gmail 和 Gemini 整合到一起。 我问他 Google 自由现金流转为负值、AI 基础设施建设中的风险,以及他如何在还不知道模型将具备何种能力的数年前就规划需求。他解释了让他有信心继续投入的信号,以及他如何使用 AI 智能体来跟踪 Google 内部的模型开发和算力使用情况。 时间戳: 00:00 Gemini Argon 发布反响 01:49 模型访问与安全 06:20 AI 模型竞赛 08:35 智能体突破与 2027 年 11:34 递归自我改进 15:41 DeepMind 领导层变动 19:52 Google 的 AI 算力投资 25:20 AI 支出可持续吗? 33:18 Sundar 如何使用 AI 智能体 35:35 Gemini 的个人智能体计划 38:37 AI 智能体如何改变网络 43:52 Google 的太空数据中心 47:38 Waymo 的扩张战略 50:26 Wing 的无人机配送计划 51:36 AI 安全与监管 55:58 Google 的量子计算押注 YouTube:https://youtu.be/fJBSNEFdm8c Spotify:https://open.spotify.com/episode/0cJBqmVz3CWJSPdmBOeJGu?si=NBxJIMhZRgikafPtwY0sZA Substack:https://sources.news/p/sundar-pichai-gemini-4-google-other-bets Apple Podcasts:https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/sundar-pichai-on-gemini-4-and-the-ai-compute-crunch/id1840154537?i=1000797461022 本期节目的呈现赞助商是 @hyperagentapp。感谢节目的首席赞助商:@Atlassian、@meetgranola 和 @mercury。

    推荐理由:Pichai 亲自回应 DeepMind 领导层变动,把前沿模型开发描述为全消耗性工作,可以从中读出 Google 高层对这一阶段节奏的判断。

  12. Azeem Azhar:Exponential View66

    互联网的「武汉时刻」:AI 智能体攻击正在加速蔓延

    Azeem Azhar 撰文认为互联网正进入类似 2020 年初疫情爆发前的临界状态,软件与网络空间正遭受 AI 智能体驱动的持续攻击。文中列举 PHP2Shell 漏洞(PHP 支撑约 70% 的网站)、Node.js 同日修补关键缺陷,以及微软披露某中国国家关联组织用开源智能体集群在不到三小时内控制云账户,每分钟发起 2,900 次登录尝试、波及超过 2,250 个组织。

  13. Rohan Paul65

    NYU 教授 Aswath Damodaran 发长文分析,Anthropic IPO 将按 run-rate 收入定价,而非基于现金流估值;H1 2026 Anthropic 亏损 $8.7B、OpenAI 亏损 $21.6B(不含非现金费用),使收益倍数法失效,ARR 成为 AI 版的互联网眼球数。

    引用Aswath Damodaran@AswathDamodaran

    As Anthropic's IPO nears its target date, it it worth remembering that IPOs get priced, and that as a young company with growing revenues and big losses, that pricing will be based on metrics that are buzzy and unfamiliar, from eyeballs in the dotcom era to users in the social media decade to ARR with AI companies...https://bit.ly/4iBwsHm

  14. The Verge:AI30

    The Vergecast 讨论 iPhone Duo 评测:它本该是 iPad 吗?

    The Vergecast 本期节目围绕 iPhone Duo 的 7/10 评分展开讨论,David 与 Nilay 争论这一分数是否合适,并探讨若以 iPad 而非 iPhone 为起点、甚至改叫 iPad Duo 是否会更好。节目还谈及本周震动网络的 PHP 安全漏洞,以及 AI 购物兴起迫使零售商应对 Muse 智能体等话题。

  15. Claude:YouTube33

    Factory 如何用 Claude 构建自主软件工程

    Factory 联合创始人兼 CEO Matan Grinberg 与 Anthropic 的 Kai Gill 对谈,介绍其 AI 编码智能体 Droids 如何借助 Claude 的前沿模型处理大型代码库中的长周期任务,让团队减少人工监督即可信任智能体方案。他提到一次 COBOL 现代化改造减少了 90% 的人力投入,并讨论了实现完全自主“dark factory”还面临哪些障碍。

  16. Addy Osmani50

    Addy Osmani 认为,提升 Agent 输出质量的关键是给它验证自己工作的方式,并判断验证将成为今年最重要的课题之一。他在 E2E 测试之外让 Claude 录制视频和截图作为工作完成的证据;引用的 Warp 实践为每个 Agent 配一台电脑,把 3-4 分钟操作剪成 15 段短片回传人工审查,显著缩短合并时间。

    引用Varoon Kodithala@varoonkodithala

    verification is the biggest bottleneck for coding agents right now according to @addyosmani. we @warpdotdev have put a lot of thought into building a good computer-use tool for Warp Factories. every agents gets a computer to navigate the apps they built, take screenshots and recordings, and post them back for human review. 3-4mins of activity get edited down to 15 clips stitched together with cursor clicks, mouse animations, and key presses. we've been able to dramatically cut our time to merge and unlocked faster iteration + review cycles, especially for projects that are hard to mock out locally!