跳到正文
Arena.ai· @arena · X·· 2 小时前精选AI 评分66
AI 导读

Arena 发布基于超过 5000 次真实智能体会话的评测结果,Meta 的 Muse Wonder (Max) 进入 Agent Arena 第12名,净提升 +6.4%,比 Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) 高 +2.8 分并上升四位。

推荐理由

原文基于5000多个真实智能体会话给出排名和成本对比,读者可据此衡量 Muse Wonder (Max) 的性价比变化。

正文 · 原文

Results based on +5K real-world agentic sessions are in: Muse Wonder (Max) by @AIatMeta just landed in the Agent Arena at #12 with +6.4% net improvement.

This result is +2.8 pts and four places above Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) at #16 with +3.6%. The added performance of Muse Wonder (Max) comes at a higher price: $1.13 median cost per task vs. $0.54 for Spark 1.3, or about 2.1× the cost.

Compared with nearby models in Agent Arena, Muse Wonder (Max) shows cost efficiency: at $1.13/task, it comes within 1 percentage point of #10 GPT-5.6 Sol (xHigh) at 25% lower cost, and within 2pts of #9 Claude Fable 5 (High) at 67% lower cost.

By category, Muse Wonder (Max) does better in Chat, Work and Code vs. Muse Spark 1.3:
- Chat: #12 (+6.5%) vs. #15 (+3.3%)
- Work: #13 (+6.8%) vs. #18 (+3.7%)
- Code: #15 (+5.2%) vs. #18 (+4.2%)

Congrats to the @AIatMeta team on this release!

引用Arena.ai@arena
Muse Wonder (Max) by @AIatMeta has entered Code Arena: WebDev at #15 with 1651 pts and Text Arena at #2 with 1513 pts! In Code Arena: WebDev, Muse Wonder (Max) landed at #15 with 1651 pts. This result is slightly lower thanMuse Spark 1.3 (Max) at #12 with 1659 pts, within 4 pts of Kimi K3 (Max) at #14 with 1655 pts, and 11 pts above Grok 4.7 (xHigh) at #16 with 1640 pts. This release is a significant improvement over past Muse models in Text Arena. Compared with Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) at #11 with 1494 pts, Muse Wonder (Max) gained +19 pts and 9 places to #2. It's 12 pts behind the #1-ranked Gemini 4 Argon (High) with 1525 pts. Congrats to the @AIatMeta team on this release!
在 X 查看被引用的帖子

来源:Arena.ai · x.com