Ethan Mollick· @emollick · X·· 2026-08-07AI 评分33
AI 导读
这篇当时受到诸多质疑的论文，如今回看愈发具有先见之明 🦄
正文 · 原文
This paper, which got very skeptical reviews at the time, looks increasingly prescient in retrospect
🦄
👀After 154 pages of tests of GPT-4, this paper concludes “Given the breadth and depth of GPT-4's capabilities, we believe that it could reasonably be viewed as an early (yet still incomplete) version of an artificial general intelligence (AGI) system.” https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12712在 X 查看被引用的帖子
来源：Ethan Mollick · x.com