🚨 AI News | TestingCatalog· @testingcatalog · X·· 2026-07-11AI 评分55
AI 导读
Grok 4.5 和 Meta Muse Spark 1.1 已在 AI/ML 平台开放测试。三款模型（含 GPT Sol）均支持在 Playground 和 API 上运行。测试提示词包括水果忍者式切水果、愤怒的小鸟式堡垒倒塌和 Crossy Road 克隆。单次运行成本：GPT Sol $1.63，Grok 4.5 $2.47，Muse Spark 1.1 $1.08。Grok 在三项测试中均表现最佳（物理、流畅度、画面俱佳）；GPT Sol 在 Crossy Road 时卡死；最便宜的 Muse Spark 在 Crossy Road 上严重卡顿。
正文 · 原文
Grok 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.1 are now available on the AI/ML platform for testing.
What a week; all 3 models in the comparison dropped just recently. There will be a lot to experiment with.
AI/ML has tested the new models on prompts for playable mini-games, including a Fruit Ninja-style slicer and a Crossy Road clone. All three are live in the Playground and via API for side-by-side runs on output and cost.
Grok 4.5 crushed OpenAI & Meta in this test! Cost per run: GPT Sol $1.63 Grok 4.5 $2.47 Meta Muse Spark 1.1 $1.08 The three prompts: • Fruit Ninja – style slicing game • Angry Birds – style fort collapse • Crossy Road clone Grok nailed all three: clean physics, smooth playback, good visuals. GPT Sol did fine until Crossy Road, where it froze. Meta Muse Spark was cheapest and it showed: its Crossy Road lagged badly. The question isn't which model is cheapest, it's what a broken output costs you in reruns, wasted time, and things you can't ship. Cheap stops being cheap when it doesn't work.在 X 查看被引用的帖子
来源：🚨 AI News | TestingCatalog · x.com