Ethan Mollick· @emollick · X·· 2026-06-03AI 评分47
AI 导读
法学教授们写下了他们在办公时间被学生问到的问题。Gemini 2.5 和人类分别作答，然后其他法学教授在不知道答案作者的情况下对结果进行了评判： - Gemini 的胜率为 75%，击败了教授们 - Gemini 的答案被评为比人类的答案危害更小 - 更新的模型表现甚至更好
正文 · 原文
Law professors wrote questions they were asked during office hours. Gemini 2.5 & humans answered them then other law professors blindly judged the results:
-Gemini had a 75% win rate vs. professors
-Gemini's answers were rated LESS harmful than humans
-Newer models do even better
In a new Stanford study, law professors by far preferred Gemini 2.5 Pro's responses over those written by their peers when they were unaware of who wrote the answers.在 X 查看被引用的帖子
来源：Ethan Mollick · x.com