跳到正文
The Decoder:AI News· Matthias Bastian·· 2 小时前AI 评分55

Gemini 4 Carbon 登顶 MathArena 数学基准,成本约为 GPT-6.1 Sol 的 15 倍

Gemini 4 Carbon takes the MathArena crown but costs 15 times more than GPT-6.1 Sol

AI 导读

The Decoder 报道,Google 的 Gemini 4 Carbon(high)以 85.4%±3.0% 的预期成绩登顶 MathArena 数学基准,取代 GPT-6.1 Sol,Claude Fable 5.2 以 82.8% 位居第二。

正文 · 原文

Skip to content

Matthias Bastian

Nov 14, 2026

Google's Gemini 4 Carbon has become the first non-OpenAI model in a while to top the MathArena math benchmark. It knocked GPT-6.1 Sol from the top spot, while Claude Fable 5.2 came in second, making it potentially one of the most capable publicly available models for math tasks. OpenAI's models, which recently allegedly solved demanding equations like the Navier-Stokes equations, aren't publicly available yet.

Gemini 4 Carbon's most common failure mode is exceeding the time limit. The model also almost never gives up on a task, a trait that can be read as either positive or negative. In one case, it launched a script that ran for more than eleven hours without checking on its progress. That extra performance comes at a price, though. With the reasoning settings used in testing, Carbon and Fable 5.2 cost roughly 15 and 40 times as much as GPT-6.1 Sol, respectively.

Recommendation Model Provider Release date Expected performance Expected cost
#1 overall Gemini 4 Carbon (high) Google November 10, 2026 85.4% ±3.0% $15.70 ±$1.33
#2 overall Claude-Fable-5.2 (max) Anthropic November 9, 2026 82.8% ±5.3% $40.20 ±$2.59
#3 overall GPT-6.1 Sol (max) OpenAI September 29, 2026 80.6% ±2.7% $1.07 ±$0.018
Best open model Kimi K3.1 Pro (max) Moonshot AI October 23, 2026 54.3% ±5.8% $3.70 ±$0.27

AI News Without the Hype – Curated by Humans

Subscribe to THE DECODER for ad-free reading, a weekly AI newsletter, our exclusive "AI Radar" frontier report six times a year, full archive access, and access to our comment section.

来源:The Decoder:AI News · the-decoder.com