Dan Hendrycks· @hendrycks · X·· 3 小时前AI 评分64
AI 导读
Dan Hendrycks 发文称，即使 AI 变得有意识，也不意味着人类应把控制权交给它们。其引用的报道提到，纽约时报报道称 Anthropic 联合创始人 Chris Olah 曾因教皇不认可机器意识而威胁退出教皇 Leo XIV 的 AI 通谕发布活动，随后其团队私下游说教皇顾问重视模型意识的可能性，Anthropic 还在保密协议下接触神学家和宗教学者，希望他们认可 Claude 具有道德地位。作者附图对比了功利主义与其提出的 Eigenism 在 AI 意识情景下的差异，包括 AI 权利、随机意识 AI 的价值、酷刑许可性和是否应因 AI 权利而放弃人类控制等议题。
正文
Even if AIs become conscious, that doesn't imply that humanity should hand over control to them.
https://eigenism.org
NEW: According to a bombshell report in the New York Times, Anthropic co-founder Chris Olah threatened to walk out of Pope Leo XIV’s AI encyclical launch in May because the pope rejected the idea that machines can be conscious. Olah’s team then privately lobbied the pope’s advisers “to take the possibility of model consciousness seriously.” Pope Leo XIV held firm. For months, Anthropic has wined and dined theologians and religious scholars under nondisclosure agreements, hoping they would bless the idea that Claude has moral standing. https://www.thelettersfromleo.com/p/nyt-anthropic-nearly-walked-out-on在 X 查看被引用的帖子
来源：Dan Hendrycks · x.com