Nathan Lambert· @natolambert · X·· 2 小时前AI 评分36
AI 导读
我觉得很奇怪，Anthropic 在做这件事之前，为了寻求监管帮助造了那么大的声势。希望现在能重新开启对话。 更奇怪的是，他们还强调从自家有漏洞的 API 学习有害行为的安全风险。如果 API 不安全，就别托管它。
正文
It’s bizarre to me how much noise anthropic made asking for regulatory help before doing this. Hopefully can be a conversation reset now.
Was doubly bizarre bc they emphasized the security risk of learning harmful behaviors from their leaky api. If API is unsafe don’t host it.
Over the last few months, we’ve made significant progress in reducing the effectiveness of distillation attacks against Claude. In this post, we explain how: https://www.anthropic.com/research/distillation-defenses在 X 查看被引用的帖子
来源：Nathan Lambert · x.com