跳到正文
Nathan Lambert· @natolambert · X·· 2 小时前AI 评分44
AI 导读

Nathan Lambert 称这是迄今关于中国 LLM 数据经济最好的一篇文章,指出美国数据供应端由 Mercor、Surge、Handshake 等网络最大,中国则由腾讯、阿里、字节领跑,与 OpenAI、Anthropic 主导美国的格局不同。

正文

This is the best piece I’ve read to date on the Chinese data economy for LLMs, and how it compares to the US counterparts (summarized by Mercor, Surge, and Handshake having the biggest network, SUPPLY, but also many companies with specialized services, in the form of RL-ready environments). China’s leading spenders, Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance, don’t mirror OpenAI and Anthropic leading the US market.

The Chinese market likely has a bias similar to their “ownership” mentality of more LLM builders in house, like Meituan, RedNote, and Xiaomi, whereas major US tech services build more on APIs and existing open-weight models.

Altogether, it seems like Chinese labs were 6–12 months behind on willingness to spend on data, relative to the US, but are rapidly catching up.

I've been hearing lots of murmurings on China's AI industry, but folks are secretive, so it's hard to put this all together.

来源:Nathan Lambert · x.com