跳到正文
Noam Brown· @polynoamial · X·· 2 小时前AI 评分51
AI 导读

Dwarkesh Patel 花费 20,000 美元 API 额度让多个 AI 模型在社交欺骗游戏 Blood on the Clocktower 中对弈,并上线了 benchmark 网站 clocktowerbench.com,也开放让人类与 AI 对玩。他观察到模型今年在临场策划、虚张声势和协作推理拆穿阴谋方面明显进步,并称 OpenAI 新模型在该游戏上明显强于 Anthropic。Noam Brown 转发表示对该评测方法印象深刻,并邀请 Dwarkesh 到 OpenAI 设计 evals;附图给出了 GPT-6 Astra、GPT-6.1 Sol、Fable 5.1、Opus 5.5 等模型的 Elo 对比。

正文 · 原文

Honestly quite impressed with the methodology on this benchmark. @dwarkesh_sp want a job designing evals at @OpenAI?

引用Dwarkesh Patel@dwarkesh_sp
I spent 20,000 dollars in API credits having different AI models play each other at Blood on the Clocktower (a Mafia or Werewolf type social deception game). The results were fascinating. Models have gotten much better over the course of this year at creative on-the-spot scheming and bluffing, and also at reasoning as a team to break apart these underground conspiracies. I go through some of the most standout games these AIs played in this video. The new models are getting pretty good. If my friends pulled off some of these moves while we were playing, I’d give them a fist bump. Fwiw, OpenAI’s newer models are much better than Anthropic’s at this game. You can see the full benchmark at the website, and I’ve also made it so that you and your friends can play again the AIs: http://clocktowerbench.com
在 X 查看被引用的帖子

来源:Noam Brown · x.com