Nathan Lambert · @natolambert · X·2026-09-25 21:12·3小时前
AI 导读

听说 AI 监管的风声渐起,尤其是带着一种“开源危险、闭源安全”的错误论调,所以觉得有必要重发这篇。有一些方法可以让 AI 行业更安全,同时不削弱透明度、教育和竞争。https://www.interconnects.ai/p/banning-open-source-ai-would-be-a

Nathan Lambert@natolambert
30AI 编辑部评分,满分 100
2026-09-25 21:12· 3小时前
AI 导读

听说 AI 监管的风声渐起,尤其是带着一种“开源危险、闭源安全”的错误论调,所以觉得有必要重发这篇。有一些方法可以让 AI 行业更安全,同时不削弱透明度、教育和竞争。https://www.interconnects.ai/p/banning-open-source-ai-would-be-a

Hearing AI regulation is in the air, especially with a misguided tone of “open dangerous, closed safe” so it felt timely to re-up this one. There are ways to make the AI industry safer without kneecapping transparency, education, and competition. https://www.interconnects.ai/p/banning-open-source-ai-would-be-a

来源:Nathan Lambert· x.com