# Qwen-Planner-Agent：面向真实移动规划智能体的闭环 AI-for-AI 框架

- 来源：HuggingFace Daily Papers（社区热门论文）
- 发布时间：2026-09-24 08:00
- AIHOT 分数：38
- AIHOT 链接：https://aihot.news/items/cmugc3elz0n0vrogvzv0fzmml
- 原文链接：https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29892

## AI 摘要

阿里 Qwen 团队提出 Qwen-Planner-Agent，一个连接数据生产、模型训练与部署的闭环 AI-for-AI 框架，用于可扩展地开发移动规划智能体。

## 正文

The rapid progression of large language models is extending AI from passive content generation into the active workflows of engineering and scientific discovery. This shift raises a compelling question: can AI be both the object of development and an active participant in building next-generation AI systems? We explore this question by building Qwen-Planner-Agent within a closed-loop AI-for-AI framework for scalable development and iterative improvement. Mobile planning offers a demanding test of this approach: complex, long-horizon tasks challenge agent reliability, while costly real-device interaction limits development scalability.

The framework connects data production, model training, and deployment through a shared action-feedback-verification contract. (i) AI for Data builds a human-gated agentic data flywheel in which specialized agents construct tasks, collect interaction trajectories, curate and balance training data, and use training feedback to guide subsequent data generation. (ii) AI for Training combines a supervised planning cold start with hybrid-environment online agentic reinforcement learning, where we introduce Competence-Aware Reward-and-Advantage Engineering (CARE) to reduce reasoning and tool-use costs while preserving task performance. (iii) AI drives model--harness co-evolution through an execution-evidence-driven loop that orchestrates memory, skills, and tools at runtime and feeds structured action feedback and preserved failure traces back into coordinated model and harness adaptation.

Qwen-Planner-Agent achieves the best overall performance among all evaluated models and systems on MobilePA-Bench, improving over its base model across tool use, memory, skills, and sub-agent coordination. Further evaluations of our model show improvements across non-mobile agentic benchmarks while largely preserving general capabilities.