# Grok 4.7 在 AA-Briefcase 上仅次于 Anthropic 模型，排名紧追 Opus 5，每任务成本约为其 50%

- 来源：Artificial Analysis (@ArtificialAnlys)
- 发布时间：2026-09-22 06:57
- AIHOT 分数：36
- AIHOT 链接：https://aihot.news/items/cmubvcpe404icro99u1tpb7sv
- 原文链接：https://x.com/ArtificialAnlys/status/2102170392924492207

## AI 摘要

Grok 4.7 在 AA-Briefcase 上仅次于 Anthropic 模型，排名紧追 Opus 5，每任务成本约为其 50%。在 AA-Briefcase-Lite 尽调场景中，Grok 4.7 分析质量 Elo 从 Grok 4.6 的 1698 升至 1994，展示 Elo 则从 1531 微降至 1499。

## 正文

Grok 4.7 is behind only Anthropic models on AA-Briefcase, ranking just behind Opus 5 at ~50% of its Cost per Task

Grok 4.7’s improvements over Grok 4.6 are clear in AA-Briefcase-Lite, our public due diligence scenario where models are tasked with building market models and target assessment decks. Grok 4.7 gains significantly in Analytical Quality Elo (1698 → 1994) with a slight regression in Presentation Elo (1531 → 1499).

API cost to produce example decks: Grok 4.7 (xhigh) ~$8 vs. Grok 4.6 (xhigh) ~$4.40