Rohan Paul · @rohanpaul_ai · X·2026-09-18 14:02·44分钟前
AI 导读

"从资本效率角度看,OpenAI 和 Anthropic 是截然不同的两种生物。 而且 Anthropic 的每 token 成本明显远低于 OpenAI。 他们的烧钱可能比 OpenAI 少约 80%。所以作为企业,两者的结构性 ROIC 显然非常不同。" —— Gavin Baker(@GavinSBaker),美国对冲基金经理、Atreides Management 首席投资官。 --- 来自 "Invest Like The Best"(@InvestLikeBest)YouTube 频道,(链接见评论)

Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai
40AI 编辑部评分,满分 100
2026-09-18 14:02· 44分钟前
AI 导读

"从资本效率角度看,OpenAI 和 Anthropic 是截然不同的两种生物。 而且 Anthropic 的每 token 成本明显远低于 OpenAI。 他们的烧钱可能比 OpenAI 少约 80%。所以作为企业,两者的结构性 ROIC 显然非常不同。" —— Gavin Baker(@GavinSBaker),美国对冲基金经理、Atreides Management 首席投资官。 --- 来自 "Invest Like The Best"(@InvestLikeBest)YouTube 频道,(链接见评论)

"OpenAI and Anthropic are pretty different animals from a capital efficiency perspective.

And Anthropic clearly has a dramatically lower cost per token than OpenAI.

They burned maybe 80% less than OpenAI. So as businesses, they clearly have very different structural ROICs."

• Gavin Baker (@GavinSBaker ), U.S. hedge fund manager and Chief Investment Officer of Atreides Management.

--- From "Invest Like The Best" ( @InvestLikeBest ) YouTube channel, (link in comment)

来源:Rohan Paul· x.com