SoL-Pi:递归扩展自动研究循环,打造高效 Agent Harness

HuggingFace Daily Papers(社区热门论文)·2026-09-17 08:00·1天前
AI 导读

SoL-Pi 通过递归扩展自动研究循环,在 51 项任务的 EdgeBench 上达到与 Pi 相当的性能,同时将 token 流量减少 44.7-49.0%、API 成本降低约三分之一。该 harness 由动作执行、上下文压缩、观测处理和委托阅读四项机制组成,相对原生 Codex 与 Claude Code 每小时可节省 8.75-13.50 美元,相对 Pi 节省 4.36-5.71 美元。

HuggingFace Daily Papers(社区热门论文)
45AI 编辑部评分,满分 100

SoL-Pi:递归扩展自动研究循环,打造高效 Agent Harness

2026-09-17 08:00· 1天前
AI 导读

SoL-Pi 通过递归扩展自动研究循环,在 51 项任务的 EdgeBench 上达到与 Pi 相当的性能,同时将 token 流量减少 44.7-49.0%、API 成本降低约三分之一。该 harness 由动作执行、上下文压缩、观测处理和委托阅读四项机制组成,相对原生 Codex 与 Claude Code 每小时可节省 8.75-13.50 美元,相对 Pi 节省 4.36-5.71 美元。

As coding agents move from supervised code completion to unattended, around-the-clock exploration, their work expands from isolated predictions into long trajectories of reasoning, tool use, and feedback. Token efficiency therefore becomes important for scaling recursive self-improvement. We take an RSI-inspired approach at the harness layer, scaling auto-research loops across increasingly numerous and diverse environments for harness rollouts. At this scale, the process yields reusable improvements that transfer beyond their development setting, moving automated harness discovery toward production-level outcomes.

Four mechanisms survive selection and form SoL-Pi, spanning action execution, context compaction, observation handling, and delegated reading. On the 51-task EdgeBench evaluation, SoL-Pi achieves performance comparable to Pi across GPT-5.6 Sol and Opus 5 while reducing recorded token traffic by 44.7-49.0% and API cost by about one third. In other words, estimated hourly savings are \8.75-13.50 relative to native Codex and Claude Code harnesses, and \4.36-5.71 relative to Pi.

来源:HuggingFace Daily Papers(社区热门论文)· arxiv.org