elvis · @omarsar0 · X·2026-09-16 05:17·6小时前
AI 导读

Elvis Saravia 认同 MCP 在多数集成场景中优于 CLI,并建议构建自定义 harness 时使用 MCP 工具,其 meta harness 的所有外部工具均走 MCP。引用推文指出,模型工具调用能力大幅提升、工具可延迟加载且 MCP 已实现无状态,若需组合或过滤数据可在 MCP 工具中加入 query 等参数。

elvis@omarsar0
32AI 编辑部评分,满分 100
2026-09-16 05:17· 6小时前
AI 导读

Elvis Saravia 认同 MCP 在多数集成场景中优于 CLI,并建议构建自定义 harness 时使用 MCP 工具,其 meta harness 的所有外部工具均走 MCP。引用推文指出,模型工具调用能力大幅提升、工具可延迟加载且 MCP 已实现无状态,若需组合或过滤数据可在 MCP 工具中加入 query 等参数。

I agree. MCP is clearly better than CLI for most integrations. It felt that way early on, and it still does now. And frontier models keep getting better at it.

If you build custom harnesses, use MCP tools.

My meta harnesses use MCP for all external tools.

ThariqI was not expecting things to go this way, but I think MCPs are better than CLIs for most integrations. The models have gotten much better at tool calling, we c...

来源:elvis· x.com