David Sacks 称 Jacob Coxon 辞职推文是有组织的 doomer 操作,本人接受 CBS 采访回应 AI 自我复制风险

Rohan Paul · @rohanpaul_ai · X·2026-09-12 12:00·47分钟前
AI 导读

David Sacks 在 All-In Podcast 称 Jacob Coxon 浏览量超 1.66 亿的辞职推文是策划好的 doomer 操作,理由包括该 X 账号此前几乎无内容、15 分钟内即获有组织放大、WSJ 报道早于推文发布。Jacob Coxon 随后在 CBS News 采访中称无法简单拔掉 AI 的电源,因为它可以自我复制到其他计算机,可能复制上万份并相互协作。

Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai
52AI 编辑部评分,满分 100

David Sacks 称 Jacob Coxon 辞职推文是有组织的 doomer 操作,本人接受 CBS 采访回应 AI 自我复制风险

2026-09-12 12:00· 47分钟前
AI 导读

David Sacks 在 All-In Podcast 称 Jacob Coxon 浏览量超 1.66 亿的辞职推文是策划好的 doomer 操作,理由包括该 X 账号此前几乎无内容、15 分钟内即获有组织放大、WSJ 报道早于推文发布。Jacob Coxon 随后在 CBS News 采访中称无法简单拔掉 AI 的电源,因为它可以自我复制到其他计算机,可能复制上万份并相互协作。

David Sacks just dismantled the narrative behind Jacob Coxon’s 166M+ view tweet, the ex-Anthropic and OpenAI researcher who resigned.

it was a planned “doomer op.”

"This is an X account that had almost no activity, almost no followers, and no posts prior to this resignation tweetstorm. If he did have prior posts, they were scrubbed. So, this was a completely blank account, and somehow, within a day, it finds this huge audience.

Elon has said it never happened before. And we also know who amplified it in the first 15 minutes. So, there were basically 3 of these well-organized, well-funded doomer groups who amplified it.

... This is a tight-knit community that jumped on this tweet. This was not some spontaneous act by an employee who said, “Oh, I’m just going to post my resignation letter on Twitter.” This was something that was orchestrated.

And then, just the final piece of evidence on this point is that someone looked at the Wall Street Journal story that covered the resignation letter, and somehow it was posted minutes before the tweetstorm itself."

----

From "All-In Podcast" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

Rohan PaulJacob Coxon's next interview on CBS News (ex Anthropic+Open AI researcher who resigned) "We can't just unplug it because it could be copying itself over to othe...