Peter McCrory· @PeterMcCrory · X·· 2026-09-10AI 评分54
AI 导读
alexolegimas 联合 ben_moll 发布博文,分析 AI 能力快速提升为何未必转化为爆发式经济增长,认为两位数增长的预测大概率不会实现。要点是增长模型并不阻止 AI 带来爆发式增长,但该路径依赖一系列现实中难以成立的假设,例如被自动化部门因价格下降而在经济中占比缩小,这使能力大幅提升与约 4-5% 的增长(作者称已属很高)并存的趋势可能延续。
正文 · 原文
Nice, complementary research to what we shared today.
Evaluating the key economic forces that govern how large/small an effect AI will have on growth in the years ahead (and assessing which path we may be on today) is critical work.
Great work @alexolegimas @ben_moll
New post on the blog, featuring the excellent @ben_moll There’s been tons of discourse on how AI will contribute to economic growth, with many people closest to the technology predicting double digit increases. Are these forecasts likely? Probably not. The blog goes through the economics for why exploding improvements in capabilities (which technologists have been largely right about) may not translate to explosive growth. Ben’s thread covers this in detail, but gist is that: 1) there is nothing in economic growth models that prevents AI from leading to explosive growth but 2) this trajectory relies on a series of assumptions that are unlikely to hold in the real world. For example, one assumptions is likely to be violated because of a pretty counterintuitive feature of structural change: the sectors that become automated become smaller parts of the economy (because they’re cheaper, people become richer, and spending moves to non-automated parts of the economy). This, plus other features of the economy, is what will likely cause the trend of huge increases in capabilities coupled with “only” 4-5% growth (which is huge, btw) to continue. Here is the link: https://aleximas.substack.com/p/will-ai-soon-lead-to-double-digit Looking forward to hearing thoughts/feedback!在 X 查看被引用的帖子
来源:Peter McCrory · x.com