Qwen 3.8 Max 在构建 3D 物理场景上击败 Fable 5，运行成本低约 7 倍。测试由本地运行 LLM 的桌面应用 Atomic Chat 完成：Qwen 3.8 Max 输出 46.6K tokens、花费 $0.28，Fable 5 输出 38.7K tokens、花费 $1.93。
Qwen 3.8 Max just built better 3D physics scenes than Fable 5 while costing about 7x less to run.
Test was done by @atomic_chat_hq , a desktop app that runs LLMs locally.
Outputs:
Qwen 3.8 Max: 46.6K tokens, $0.28
Fable 5: 38.7K tokens, $1.93
Both models got the same brief, three self-contained HTML files, each a scene that simulates itself.
The prompts asked for a marble machine lifting marbles onto a wheel and a loop, a car assembly line, and a sawmill cutting logs into planks.
These tests were actually pretty brutal. Shows whether the model maintained object state, collisions, and machine geometry across the whole scene.
Qwen 3.8 Max beat Fable 5 at building 3D physics scenes for 7x cheaper! We gave two models the same task. Build three self-contained 3D scenes, each one HTML file with real physics that runs itself. Prompts: - A marble machine that lifts marbles up a wheel and drops them on a loop - A car factory assembly line - A sawmill cutting logs into planks Outputs: Qwen 3.8 Max: 46.6K tokens, $0.28 Fable 5: 38.7K tokens, $1.93 Qwen worked much harder on the details. Its textures and shadows look real. Fable 5 built a fast prototype that works and left it there. In the marble machine, Fable's marbles show up from nowhere at the top of the wheel. In Qwen's, you can see them go up. On the car line, Qwen's cars look much better and more real. Fable's sawmill is very strange. The saw looks wrong, and the log goes right through a beam before the saw cuts it. Atomic Chat will have day zero support to run Qwen 3.8 Max locally!在 X 查看被引用的帖子
来源：Rohan Paul · x.com