Rohan Paul· @rohanpaul_ai · X·· 2026-07-01AI 评分58
AI 导读
atomic.chat桌面应用对Claude Sonnet 5、Opus 4.8、Sonnet 4.6及GPT 5.5进行对比测试。使用同一提示词构建三个HTML5物理碰撞演示（汽车撞墙、破坏球毁屋、投石机砸城）。Sonnet 5在全部测试中与GPT 5.5和Opus 4.8表现相当，其中破坏球场景胜Opus 4.8，投石机场景胜GPT 5.5。Sonnet 5仅用15,047 tokens（$0.15），GPT 5.5使用31,152 tokens（$0.94），成本低约6倍；Opus 4.8使用23,063 tokens（$0.58），Sonnet 4.6使用25,824 tokens（$0.39）。Sonnet 5 token消耗最少，图形细节仍有提升空间。
正文 · 原文
atomic[.]chat, a desktop app that runs LLMs locally, ran a very revealing comparison for Claude Sonnet 5, Claude Opus 4.8, Claude Sonnet 4.6, and GPT 5.5.
Claude Sonnet 5 just matched GPT 5.5 on 3 physics coding demos at 6x lower cost.
Also spent minimum number of tokens.
- Sonnet 5: 15,047 tokens, $0.15
- Opus 4.8: 23,063 tokens, $0.58
- Sonnet 4.6: 25,824 tokens, $0.39
- GPT 5.5: 31,152 tokens, $0.94
New Claude Sonnet 5 performs at GPT 5.5 level 6x cheaper! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics crash demos Prompts: - A car crashes into a brick wall - A wrecking ball destroys a house - A catapult throws a rock at a castle wall Outputs: Sonnet 5: 15,047 tokens, $0.15 Opus 4.8: 23,063 tokens, $0.58 Sonnet 4.6: 25,824 tokens, $0.39 GPT 5.5: 31,152 tokens, $0.94 Sonnet 5 did as well as Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 on all three tests. In the wrecking ball test, it beat Opus 4.8. The cable moves smoothly and every hit connects. In the catapult test, it beat GPT 5.5. The rock always lands inside the wall. Sonnet 5 still needs better detail and graphics. But it used fewer tokens than every other model在 X 查看被引用的帖子
来源：Rohan Paul · x.com