Nathan Lambert· @natolambert · X·· 2026-06-20AI 评分42
AI 导读
Nathan Lambert引用hlntnr的推文,用森林怪物比喻解释Anthropic的AI安全世界观:他们认为存在巨大且危险的怪物(超级智能风险),其他竞争者为了宝藏不顾危险,而Anthropic选择派出自己的先遣队,更快更深入地进入森林,投入大量资源进行怪物控制和驯服,并向外界报告发现。这种策略虽然逻辑自洽,但也让外界质疑其是否疯狂或说谎。
正文 · 原文
Well said.
Even before Mythos I was getting asked more and more what Anthropic's deal is, and why tf they're acting the way they're acting if they believe what they say they believe. The best answer I can give is that their basic worldview is something like: 1. There are giant, dangerous monsters in the forest 2. We see others going out and making loud noises that will rouse the monsters, and they're not going to stop because of all the treasure and magical artifacts that can be found in the forest 3. We believe the best way we can help is to send out our own vanguard to go faster and farther into the forest than everyone else, because we'll spend a ton on monster containment and taming and we'll also send back detailed reports of what monsters we're finding so that the townspeople can ready themselves, which those other guys won't do On the one hand I understand how they got there, and I think it's possible they're basically right. On the other hand it's not hard to see why this approach makes people wonder if you're crazy or lying or both.在 X 查看被引用的帖子
来源:Nathan Lambert · x.com