跳到正文
Ethan Mollick· @emollick · X·· 2026-05-01AI 评分61
AI 导读

xAI发布Grok 4.3,其在Artificial Analysis智能指数得分53,性能优于Grok 4.20、Muse Spark等模型。核心改进在于“性价比”:输入与输出价格较前代分别降低约40%和60%,且基准测试套件运行成本下降。该版本在GDPval-AA等现实智能体任务上表现显著提升,指令遵循与客服任务强劲。但推文指出,其表现仍落后于最新的中国开源模型,并批评GDPval-AA测试本身价值有限。

正文 · 原文

The new Grok comes in below the latest Chinese open weights models, Grok 4 was at the frontier when released.

(& Artificial Analysis: please stop using GDPval-AA which is not a useful test of anything except a model’s ability to impress Gemini as a judge)

引用Artificial Analysis@ArtificialAnlys
xAI has launched Grok 4.3, achieving 53 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index with improved agentic performance, ~40% lower input price, and ~60% lower output price than Grok 4.20 The release of Grok 4.3 places @xAI just above Muse Spark and Claude Sonnet 4.6 on the Intelligence Index, and a 4 points ahead of the latest version of Grok 4.20. Grok 4.3 improves its Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index score while reducing cost to run the benchmark suite. Key Takeaways: ➤ Grok 4.3 improves on cost-per-intelligence relative to Grok 4.20 0309 v2: it scores higher on the Intelligence Index while costing less to run the full benchmark suite. Grok 4.3 costs $395 to run the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, around 20% lower than Grok 4.20 0309 v2, despite using more output tokens. This makes it one of the lower-cost models at its intelligence level ➤ Large increase in real world agentic task performance: The largest single benchmark improvement is on GDPval-AA, where Grok 4.3 scores an ELO of 1500, up 321 points from Grok 4.20 0309 v2’s score of 1179 Grok 4.3, surpassing Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, Muse Spark, Gpt-5.4 mini (xhigh), and Kimi K2.5. Grok 4.3 narrows the gap to the leading model on GDPval-AA, but still trails GPT-5.5 (xhigh) by 276 Elo points, with an expected win rate of ~17% against GPT-5.5 (xhigh) under the standard Elo formula ➤ Grok 4.3’s performs strongly on instruction following and agentic customer support tasks. It gains 5 points on 𝜏²-Bench Telecom to reach 98%, in line with GLM-5.1. Grok 4.3 maintains an 81% IFBench score from Grok 4.20 0309 v2 ➤ Gains 8 points on AA-Omniscience Accuracy, but at the cost of lower AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination Rate of 8 points, so Grok 4.20 0309 v2 still leads AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination Rate, followed by MiMo-V2.5-Pro, in line with Grok 4.3 Congratulations to @xAI and @elonmusk on the impressive release!
在 X 查看被引用的帖子

来源:Ethan Mollick · x.com