跳到正文
The Decoder:AI News· Matthias Bastian·· 2026-04-19AI 评分51

首批 token 计数显示,尽管 Anthropic 定价持平,Opus 4.7 成本仍显著高于 4.6

First token counts reveal Opus 4.7 costs significantly more than 4.6 despite Anthropic's flat pricing

AI 导读

Anthropic 的 Opus 4.7 虽维持与 4.6 版本相同的每 token 定价,但用户实际成本显著攀升。原因在于新版采用新的 tokenizer,将相同文本拆解的 token 数量增加了 47%。这意味着尽管表面定价持平,Claude Code 用户每次请求的实际支出明显上涨。早期实测数据揭示了这种隐性成本增长对开发者的具体影响。

正文 · 原文

Anthropic's Opus 4.7 carries the same sticker price as 4.6, but it burns through noticeably more tokens per request. That's according to measurements published by developer Abhishek Ray on Claude Code Camp.

Anthropic's own migration guide cites an increase of 1.0 to 1.35x. Ray's numbers somewhat line up in that range, while some content types push past it: 1.325x on average for real Claude Code content, 1.445x for a CLAUDE.md file, and 1.47x for technical documentation. A community evaluation on tokens.billchambers.me goes even higher, pointing to 37.4 percent more tokens and costs per request across 483 submissions.

Community data shows a 37.4 percent jump in both token usage and per-request costs when switching from Opus 4.6 to 4.7. | Image: Screenshot via Tokenomics

Code takes a bigger hit, Ray notes, while prose sees a smaller bump, and Chinese and Japanese texts are barely affected. For a sample session of 80 turns, he estimates an extra 20 to 30 percent in costs, pushing the bill from $6.65 to somewhere between $7.86 and $8.76.

In return, users get slightly better instruction following: a test using the IFEval benchmark across 20 prompts shows Opus 4.7 sticking to strict instructions five percentage points more reliably than its predecessor.

来源:The Decoder:AI News · the-decoder.com