有开发者认为通过 CLI 使用编码智能体已经过时，交互正直接发生在智能体本身。其当前工作流混合使用高层持久智能体（如 dots）与专用智能体（如 codex desktop 会话），由持久智能体统一管理，并称 Codex desktop app 是目前最好的智能体 UI。
Use of coding agents via CLI has been dead for a while now.
We are early on discovering better interfaces but interactions now happen directly with agents and will continue that way going forward.
What is working for me is a mixture of high-level persistent agents (like dots) and specialised agents (like codex desktop sessions) that are themselves managed by the persistent agents or accessible at anytime when I need to do focused work.
This provides me lots of flexibility and I can leverage a variety of experiences and interactions with agents that range from the simpleness of grok bot to the more involved sessions offered by codex desktop.
These again are some of the advantages
I enjoy because I have built my own agent orchestrator and harness.
I haven’t touched Claude Code or Codex CLI in a while. The terminal era is over imo. It's the wrong interface for coding agents. Tabs are ephemeral, but context is persistent, and managing 30 tabs is pure cognitive overhead. I don’t really need an IDE like Cursor either. I rarely navigate the whole codebase anymore. The new primitive is the agent, not the file. (Codex desktop app is the best agentic UI for now. But we’re still early.)在 X 查看被引用的帖子
来源：elvis · x.com