AI/ML API 让 Claude Fable 5.2 与 GPT-6.1 Sol 各自构建 3D 体素电影场景，Fable 5.2 花费 $108.87，GPT-6.1 Sol 花费 $13.02。成本差异源于 Fable 5.2 严格坚持体素风格，每一缕烟雾都是模型需放置的几何体，且每个镜头都做到了。在撞车镜头中，Fable 的翻车有光照、涂装可辨，Sol 的车则是暗色剪影。
Interesting experiment by AI/ML API (@aimlapi).
Claude Fable 5.2 against GPT-6.1 Sol on building a 3D voxel movie scene.
Fable 5.2 spent $108.87 and GPT-6.1 Sol $13.02.
But that cost reflects that extra work: Fable 5.2 sticks to voxels. A strict voxel style means every puff of smoke is geometry the model has to place, and Fable did it in every shot.
Also, in the crash shot, Fable’s flipping car is lit and its paint scheme is readable. Sol’s car is a dark silhouette in the same shot.
you can try Fable 5.2 vs GPT-6.1 Sol on aimlapi[.]com
在 X 查看被引用的帖子Fable 5.2 vs GPT-6.1 Sol at Cars movie 🏁
Fable 5.2 re-created the Cars Piston Cup finale in 3D voxels for $108.87 while GPT-6.1 Sol's version cost $13.02
Run both models via API -> aimlapi.com
来源：Rohan Paul · x.com