Claude Code 团队谈 AI 时代的代码评审如何从末端门槛变为持续检查

Quoting Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang

AI 导读

Simon Willison 引用 Addy Osmani、Morgan Westlee Lunt 和 Qing Wang 关于 Claude Code 团队代码评审的文章，认为“是否有人类读过代码”是判断变更风险的不精确代理，更应问的是变更可能出什么问题、该用自动化还是人工检查来发现。

正文

We think "did a human read the code?" is an imprecise proxy for "what could go wrong with this change, and which check—automated or human—is the right one to catch it?"

Asking that question also changed when review happens. Before, review was a gate at the end of the road: write the code, open a PR, wait for your colleague.

Now, review runs continuously, more like spellcheck while you write. Most changes have been reviewed and fixed by Claude at least once before a human is asked to look. This catches most routine mistakes, and saves team attention for higher-level questions and scrutiny.

— Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang, How the Claude Code team does code review

Tags: anthropic, claude, ai, claude-code, llms, addy-osmani, coding-agents, generative-ai, agentic-engineering, code-review