arXiv 限令:每人每月最多提交两篇论文以应对 AI 论文洪流
arXiv 自 2026 年 10 月 1 日起将每人每月投稿上限设为两篇,因月投稿量已突破 40,000 篇,两年翻倍,仅 cs.AI 类目就增长超过六倍,志愿者审核不堪重负。
arXiv 自 2026 年 10 月 1 日起将每人每月投稿上限设为两篇,因月投稿量已突破 40,000 篇,两年翻倍,仅 cs.AI 类目就增长超过六倍,志愿者审核不堪重负。
Excited to introduce JEPA-Anything! One world model that works across molecules, cells, fluids, patients, robots, or even weather. Let's World Model Everything! 📄Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20800 💻Code: https://github.com/Gen-Verse/JEPA-Anything
arXiv 宣布对预印本投稿实施限流,每位研究者每个日历月最多提交 2 篇,同时最多 3 篇在审投稿,原因是 AI 生成的低质量论文淹没了志愿者审核团队。据 arXiv 数据,月度投稿从 2016 年 9 月的 9,869 篇增至 2026 年 9 月的 40,363 篇,两年内翻倍,计算机科学类别增长六倍,并出现大量窄范围薄论文、香肠切片式拆分论文和 AI 撰写的低价值论文。
arXiv 于 10 月 1 日起实施速率限制新政策,所有投稿者每月提交上限设为 2 篇、同时在审活跃稿件上限设为 3 篇。2026 年 9 月单月投稿达 40,363 篇创历史新高,较 2024 年 9 月的 20,569 篇翻倍,cs.AI 类别两年内投稿量增长超 6 倍;生成式 AI 降低写作门槛导致低质稿件上升,志愿者审核时间被大量占用,高质量论文审核延迟数天至数周。
我在预印本网站上发现多篇署有我名字的AI垃圾论文,这些论文我从未撰写也从未见过。我交谈过的其他学者也有同样遭遇。 我不认为这些都是真的……尽管质量尚可的AI论文工厂很快就会出现。
This University of Chicago business school professor has authored 258 academic papers in 2026 (so far). https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2026/08/27/258/
🚀 What if video generators could build on representations that already understand the visual world? We are excited to introduce V-RAE: Rethinking Video Latent Spaces for Generation. Recent progress in image generation has begun to move beyond conventional VAE latents, exploring both direct pixel-space and representation-based approaches. Video generation, however, still depends heavily on latent compression, as the scale and redundancy of spatiotemporal data make direct modeling prohibitively expensive. However, most video VAEs are optimized for pixel reconstruction, and a latent space that reconstructs well is not necessarily easy to generate. V-RAE takes a different approach: it directly uses representations from frozen vision foundation models as the generative latent space, rather than as auxiliary supervision. We study DINOv3, SigLIP2, EUPE, and V-JEPA 2.1. A lightweight temporal attention pooling module compresses their dense features by 4×, followed by a spatiotemporal Transformer decoder. Under matched generation backbones, latent budgets, and training settings, V-RAE achieves: 🏆 2.13 rFVD on Kinetics-600 🎬 117.86 gFVD on UCF101 and 19.16 gFVD on Kinetics-600 ⚡ Up to 6× faster convergence than VAE-based latent spaces 🧠 90.92% semantic probing accuracy on UCF101 🌍 Better future prediction on Cityscapes, reducing gFVD from 144.47 to 111.36 Our experiments also reveal a broader finding: Good Reconstruction ≠ Good Generation. During generation, predicted latents inevitably deviate from real encoding trajectories. If the latent space is not sufficiently smooth, small errors can be amplified into visible artifacts. We therefore introduce tFVD to evaluate temporal smoothness and robustness to latent prediction errors. It correlates much more strongly with downstream generation quality, reaching 0.919 on Kinetics-600. The takeaway: A latent space is not merely where videos are compressed—it determines what the generator must learn. When semantics and temporal structure are already organized in the representation, generation becomes easier to learn. Representation first. Generation follows. Many thanks to my mentors, @ScottNLP and @SQWu_Tori, for their continuous guidance and support. I am also deeply grateful to @sainingxie for his valuable guidance and invaluable feedback, which greatly helped shape V-RAE. 🙏 Hi @_akhaliq, we would truly appreciate your help in sharing V-RAE with the broader AI research community. Thank you! 🙏 📄 Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13556 💻 Code: https://github.com/V-RAE/V-RAE 🤗 Models: https://huggingface.co/Guomh0707/V-RAE-Models 🌐 Project: https://v-rae.github.io #VideoGeneration #GenerativeAI #ComputerVision #WorldModels #RepresentationLearning #RAE
1/7 🌍 Self-evolving agents learn from interaction, but most benchmarks keep the environment fixed. If conditions change and a working solution fails, can the agent adapt? Introducing PACE-Bench: Benchmarking Physics Adaptation via Code Evolution in Dynamic Environments. 🧵
普林斯顿、华盛顿大学等机构的一项理论经济学研究认为,即便大语言模型完美无缺,也可能让科研质量下降而非提升。模型基于最优觅食理论模拟发现,在三种AI介入科研的场景中,两种会导致研究深度下降,因为节省的时间会被用于启动新项目而非深化现有工作。作者指出,LLM提高了时间的机会成本,促使人们“做得更多、但做得更差”。