跳到正文
10月11日周日
10月7日周三
10月6日周二
  1. Dongxi 东锡 NLP34

    JEPA-Anything: 跨不同世界学习预测模型

    引用Yingcheng Charles Wu@Charles_Y_Wu

    Excited to introduce JEPA-Anything! One world model that works across molecules, cells, fluids, patients, robots, or even weather. Let's World Model Everything! 📄Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20800 💻Code: https://github.com/Gen-Verse/JEPA-Anything

10月5日周一
  1. 404 Media73

    arXiv 因 AI 垃圾论文泛滥实施投稿限流

    arXiv 宣布对预印本投稿实施限流,每位研究者每个日历月最多提交 2 篇,同时最多 3 篇在审投稿,原因是 AI 生成的低质量论文淹没了志愿者审核团队。据 arXiv 数据,月度投稿从 2016 年 9 月的 9,869 篇增至 2026 年 9 月的 40,363 篇,两年内翻倍,计算机科学类别增长六倍,并出现大量窄范围薄论文、香肠切片式拆分论文和 AI 撰写的低价值论文。

10月2日周五
  1. IT之家·人工智能66

    arXiv 出台新规:每人每月限投 2 篇,应对 AI 灌水稿激增

    arXiv 于 10 月 1 日起实施速率限制新政策,所有投稿者每月提交上限设为 2 篇、同时在审活跃稿件上限设为 3 篇。2026 年 9 月单月投稿达 40,363 篇创历史新高,较 2024 年 9 月的 20,569 篇翻倍,cs.AI 类别两年内投稿量增长超 6 倍;生成式 AI 降低写作门槛导致低质稿件上升,志愿者审核时间被大量占用,高质量论文审核延迟数天至数周。

8月28日周五
  1. Ethan Mollick52

    我在预印本网站上发现多篇署有我名字的AI垃圾论文,这些论文我从未撰写也从未见过。我交谈过的其他学者也有同样遭遇。 我不认为这些都是真的……尽管质量尚可的AI论文工厂很快就会出现。

    引用Andrew Gelman et al.@StatModeling

    This University of Chicago business school professor has authored 258 academic papers in 2026 (so far). https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2026/08/27/258/

8月27日周四
  1. Saining Xie33

    谢赛宁转发介绍 V-RAE,该模型直接采用冻结视觉基础模型(DINOv3、SigLIP2、EUPE、V-JEPA 2.1)的表征作为视频生成潜空间,而非传统 VAE 潜空间。在匹配设置下,V-RAE 在 Kinetics-600 上达 2.13 rFVD,UCF101 上 117.86 gFVD,收敛速度比 VAE 潜空间快 6 倍,并引入 tFVD 评估时序平滑度。

    引用Minghui Guo@MinghuiGuo77

    🚀 What if video generators could build on representations that already understand the visual world? We are excited to introduce V-RAE: Rethinking Video Latent Spaces for Generation. Recent progress in image generation has begun to move beyond conventional VAE latents, exploring both direct pixel-space and representation-based approaches. Video generation, however, still depends heavily on latent compression, as the scale and redundancy of spatiotemporal data make direct modeling prohibitively expensive. However, most video VAEs are optimized for pixel reconstruction, and a latent space that reconstructs well is not necessarily easy to generate. V-RAE takes a different approach: it directly uses representations from frozen vision foundation models as the generative latent space, rather than as auxiliary supervision. We study DINOv3, SigLIP2, EUPE, and V-JEPA 2.1. A lightweight temporal attention pooling module compresses their dense features by 4×, followed by a spatiotemporal Transformer decoder. Under matched generation backbones, latent budgets, and training settings, V-RAE achieves: 🏆 2.13 rFVD on Kinetics-600 🎬 117.86 gFVD on UCF101 and 19.16 gFVD on Kinetics-600 ⚡ Up to 6× faster convergence than VAE-based latent spaces 🧠 90.92% semantic probing accuracy on UCF101 🌍 Better future prediction on Cityscapes, reducing gFVD from 144.47 to 111.36 Our experiments also reveal a broader finding: Good Reconstruction ≠ Good Generation. During generation, predicted latents inevitably deviate from real encoding trajectories. If the latent space is not sufficiently smooth, small errors can be amplified into visible artifacts. We therefore introduce tFVD to evaluate temporal smoothness and robustness to latent prediction errors. It correlates much more strongly with downstream generation quality, reaching 0.919 on Kinetics-600. The takeaway: A latent space is not merely where videos are compressed—it determines what the generator must learn. When semantics and temporal structure are already organized in the representation, generation becomes easier to learn. Representation first. Generation follows. Many thanks to my mentors, @ScottNLP and @SQWu_Tori, for their continuous guidance and support. I am also deeply grateful to @sainingxie for his valuable guidance and invaluable feedback, which greatly helped shape V-RAE. 🙏 Hi @_akhaliq, we would truly appreciate your help in sharing V-RAE with the broader AI research community. Thank you! 🙏 📄 Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13556 💻 Code: https://github.com/V-RAE/V-RAE 🤗 Models: https://huggingface.co/Guomh0707/V-RAE-Models 🌐 Project: https://v-rae.github.io #VideoGeneration #GenerativeAI #ComputerVision #WorldModels #RepresentationLearning #RAE

8月26日周三
  1. OpenBMB36

    清华NLP团队推出PACE-Bench,评测智能体在物理参数突变后修改代码重新适应的能力,含36个基础任务和144组源→目标环境对。最佳成绩为Reflexion+Qwen3-14B的35.9% Pass@2,GPT-5.5达66.7%但仍失败三分之一。基准显示,基于最新模拟结果的反馈比单纯“多思考”更有效,且更多信息并不能消除重新设计的瓶颈。

    引用Yuhao Zhan@YuhaoZhan6

    1/7 🌍 Self-evolving agents learn from interaction, but most benchmarks keep the environment fixed. If conditions change and a working solution fails, can the agent adapt? Introducing PACE-Bench: Benchmarking Physics Adaptation via Code Evolution in Dynamic Environments. 🧵

8月25日周二
8月24日周一
8月23日周日
  1. The Decoder:AI News51

    研究认为AI可能让科学家做得更多但做得更差,而非更少但更好

    普林斯顿、华盛顿大学等机构的一项理论经济学研究认为,即便大语言模型完美无缺,也可能让科研质量下降而非提升。模型基于最优觅食理论模拟发现,在三种AI介入科研的场景中,两种会导致研究深度下降,因为节省的时间会被用于启动新项目而非深化现有工作。作者指出,LLM提高了时间的机会成本,促使人们“做得更多、但做得更差”。

8月22日周六